2012
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/74259914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusted subpixel method enables optimisation of bronchial measurements in high-resolution CT

Abstract: Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to present a new technique of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) bronchial measurement, which was worked out in our centre and is based on a mathematically adjusted subpixel method (ASM). Methods: This study used a bronchial tree model comprising two polyvinyl chloride/ rubber pipes with various densities placed in a larger plastic object. External and internal diameters of both pipes corresponded to the sizes of structures that are usually evaluated in HRCT sca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mean basilar ABR measured in our normal subjects (0.98 +/- 0.10) was similar to that reported elsewhere (0.98 +/- 0.14)[ 15 ], measurement techniques were also different in our study than in these two previous studies. We chose to measure outer bronchial wall diameters instead of luminal diameters for ABR calculations[ 5 , 6 ] because they are less susceptible to the effects of bronchial wall thickening, secretions and bronchospasm[ 27 29 ], and more reliably measured than luminal diameters[ 30 ]. We defined the lower lung zone as the 20 contiguous slices after take-off of the basal segmental arteries, whereas both prior authors defined this more distally, as a region within 2 cm of the lung periphery[ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mean basilar ABR measured in our normal subjects (0.98 +/- 0.10) was similar to that reported elsewhere (0.98 +/- 0.14)[ 15 ], measurement techniques were also different in our study than in these two previous studies. We chose to measure outer bronchial wall diameters instead of luminal diameters for ABR calculations[ 5 , 6 ] because they are less susceptible to the effects of bronchial wall thickening, secretions and bronchospasm[ 27 29 ], and more reliably measured than luminal diameters[ 30 ]. We defined the lower lung zone as the 20 contiguous slices after take-off of the basal segmental arteries, whereas both prior authors defined this more distally, as a region within 2 cm of the lung periphery[ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%