2019
DOI: 10.2478/jos-2019-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusting for Measurement Error in Retrospectively Reported Work Histories: An Analysis Using Swedish Register Data

Abstract: We use work histories retrospectively reported and matched to register data from the Swedish unemployment office to assess: 1) the prevalence of measurement error in reported spells of unemployment; 2) the impact of using such spells as the response variable of an exponential model; and 3) strategies for the adjustment of the measurement error. Due to the omission or misclassification of spells in work histories we cannot carry out typical adjustments for memory failures based on multiplicative models. Instead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two variables have retrospective elements even though they are not explicitly expressed. There are several problems with such items in general—e.g., desirability and memory aspects, recall time [79,80,81], and in treatment context (e.g., overly optimistic assessments) [82]. However, on a general level, these estimations and the two MIS variables (Table 6 and Table 7) agreed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two variables have retrospective elements even though they are not explicitly expressed. There are several problems with such items in general—e.g., desirability and memory aspects, recall time [79,80,81], and in treatment context (e.g., overly optimistic assessments) [82]. However, on a general level, these estimations and the two MIS variables (Table 6 and Table 7) agreed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes that patients undergo because of IMMRPs may affect the interpretations of the PROM questions when presented post-IMMRPs and at follow-up. Retrospective evaluations may be problematic (e.g., recall time, desirability, memory aspects) [ 92 , 93 , 94 ]. On the other hand, MIS and these two items generally showed the same pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the complexity of the outcome model, this could be done using simulations, just as we have done in this study (the R code employed has been included in the supplementary material). Other flexible methods that could be used as sensitivity analysis tools are simulation-extrapolation (Biewen et al, 2008;Pina-Sánchez, 2016), multiple over-imputation (Blackwell et al, 2017), or Bayesian adjustments (Gustafson, 2003;Pina-Sánchez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Caveats and Future Avenues Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%