2016
DOI: 10.1002/wsb.699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusting for seasonal harvest bias in the lactation index for white‐tailed deer management

Abstract: Recruitment estimates are critical for making wildlife harvest decisions. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) lactation rates are often used to estimate fawn recruitment. Relatively long hunting seasons in the southern United States commonly include the period when females cease lactating, with concomitant reduction in the detection of lactation by hunters. We used 1,587 site-and year-specific lactation rates from 383 deer populations in Mississippi, Alabama, and Virginia, USA, to model the rate of decl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fawn mortality is typically very low beyond 10 weeks of age; therefore, any bias from falsely assigning living fawns to harvested lactating females should be very low (Ballard et al , Vreeland et al , Rohm et al , Saalfeld and Ditchkoff ). Females frequently cease lactation during hunting season, potentially biasing lactation estimates downward; however, underestimates of lactation rate can be avoided using adjustments based on average harvest date or possibly by limiting data to early season harvest before substantial reduction in detectability (Scanlon and Urbston , Campbell et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fawn mortality is typically very low beyond 10 weeks of age; therefore, any bias from falsely assigning living fawns to harvested lactating females should be very low (Ballard et al , Vreeland et al , Rohm et al , Saalfeld and Ditchkoff ). Females frequently cease lactation during hunting season, potentially biasing lactation estimates downward; however, underestimates of lactation rate can be avoided using adjustments based on average harvest date or possibly by limiting data to early season harvest before substantial reduction in detectability (Scanlon and Urbston , Campbell et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%