Adjusting Shared Reality: Communicators' Memory Changes As Their Connection with Their Audience Changes

Abstract

Communicators' memory can be shaped by their tuning of a message to their audience's attitude, reflecting their creation of a shared reality with the audience. We investigated whether this audience-tuning effect on communicators' subsequent memory is sensitive to post-message changes in their personal connection with their audience. In Experiment 1, we created conditions unfavorable to shared reality, that is, communication with an out-group audience. The audience-tuning memory effect was absent when communication-success feedback was impersonal (experimenter-transmitted), replicating previous findings. However, it was present when success feedback was personally communicated by the out-group audience. In Experiment 2, the effect was eliminated when communicators learned that their message, intended for an in-group audience, was mistakenly delivered to an out-group audience. In Experiment 3, such elimination also occurred when the mistaken audience remained an in-group member. Thus, the personal (vs. group) relation is critical. In sum, memory adjustment reflects the situatedness of shared reality.

When Do We Confuse Self and Other in Action Memory? Reduced False Memories of Self-Performance after Observing Actions by an Out-Group vs. In-Group Actor

“…This bias has been found for affects and emotions (Xu et al, 2009; Avenanti et al, 2010; Azevedo et al, in press), but also for memory (Echterhoff et al, 2008, in press). …”

Social Cognition in the Internet Age: Same As It Ever Was?

“…They occur only when the motivation for communication is to establish what is in fact true (Echterhoff et al, 2008), and epistemic trust is a key mediator of the biasing effects of communication on memory for the original event ). In addition, relational motives are crucial for establishing shared reality through communication, as the phenomenon of shared reality is absent when communicating with a high-status member (Echterhoff, Lang, Krämer, & Higgins, 2009) or when the relationship with the audience has been interrupted (Echterhoff, Kopietz, & Higgins, 2013).…”

Creating shared reality about ambiguous sexual harassment: The role of stimulus ambiguity in audience-tuning effects on memory.

“…We calculated the sample size required to detect audienceattitude effects on recall. Several previous studies have obtained large effects (Á 2 of at least .26) despite variations in target material and methodology (Echterhoff et al, 2005(Echterhoff et al, , 2013Echterhoff, Lang, et al, 2009;Kopietz et al, 2010). For the conservative estimate of Á 2 = 26 for the effect size, a power of .80, and a Type I error threshold of p = .05, the cell size needed to detect the effect is n = 12, calculated with the software G*Power (Faul, Erdfelder, Buchner, & Lang, 2009).…”