Adjusting the errors of the GM(1, 2) grey model in the financial data series using an adaptive fuzzy controller

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to focus on the adjustment of the GM(1, 2) errors for financial data series that measures changes in the public sector financial indicators, taking into account that the errors in grey models remain a key problem in reconstructing the original data series. Design/methodology/approach Adjusting the errors in grey models must follow some rules that most often cannot be determined based on the chaotic trends they register in reconstructing data series. In order to ensure the adjustment of these errors, for improving the robustness of GM(1, 2), was constructed an adaptive fuzzy controller which is based on two input variables and one output variable. The input variables in the adaptive fuzzy controller are: the absolute error ε i 0 ( k ) [ % ] of GM(1, 2), and the distance between two values x i 0 ( k ) [ % ] , while the output variable is the error adjustment A ε i 0 ( k ) [ % ] determined with the help of the above-mentioned input variables. Findings The adaptive fuzzy controller has the advantage that sets the values for error adjustments by the intensity (size) of the errors, in this way being possible to determine the value adjustments for each element of the reconstructed financial data series. Originality/value To ensure a robust process of planning the financial resources, the available financial data are used for long periods of time, in order to notice the trend of the financial indicators that need to be planned. In this context, the financial data series could be reconstituted using grey models that are based on sequences of financial data that best describe the status of the analyzed indicators and the status of the relevant factors of influence. In this context, the present study proposes the construction of a fuzzy adaptive controller that with the help of the output variable will ensure the error’s adjustment in the reconstituted data series with GM(1, 2).

Linear Programming and Fuzzy Optimization to Substantiate Investment Decisions in Tangible Assets

“…Nevertheless, the scientific community has extensively used artificial intelligence techniques in decision-making problems as these techniques allow a proper data analysis through specific intelligent algorithms [ 18 ]. Among them, fuzzy theory has a particular place as it succeeds in ensuring the comparability of the variables and the used criteria, providing often robust algorithms and a simple reasoning process [ 19 ]. Even more, in some cases, a series of randomized optimization algorithms can be considered for the fuzzy logic design as suggested in [ 20 ].…”

The Development of a Fuzzy Logic System in a Stochastic Environment with Normal Distribution Variables for Cash Flow Deficit Detection in Corporate Loan Policy

“…Aksoy et al [11] constructed a fuzzy logic system to solve multi-period dynamic decision making for strategic supplier selection with stochastic demand, while Ghani et al [12] developed a fuzzy logic intelligent system for measuring customer loyalty and decision making. Bolos et al [13] elaborated on a model that adjusts the GM(1, 2) errors for financial data series that measure changes in the public sector financial indicators. Adjusting the errors in grey models must follow some rules that cannot be determined based on the chaotic trends they register in reconstructing data series.…”

Analysing the high-tech industry with a multivariable grey forecasting model based on fractional order accumulation

“…However, when the time response formula of the model is solved, it is required to assume that the variation range of each factor variable after the first-order cumulative generation is very small, which is not common in reality, so the simulative and predictive accuracy of the model is not high in most cases for practical problems. Since then, many scholars have made improvements to the model (Luo et al, 2009;Wang, 2014;Tien, 2012;Wang and Hao, 2016;Bolos et al, 2016;Xie et al, 2017;Wang, 2018). Although some achievements have been made, it has not truly solved the inaccurate problem of the time response formula.…”