2011
DOI: 10.2202/1559-0410.1297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusting Winning-Percentage Standard Deviations and a Measure of Competitive Balance for Home Advantage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RSD represents the competitive balance: the smaller the ratio the lesser the differences in team abilities and, therefore, greater competitive balance; the higher the ratio the greater the differences in team abilities and, hence, lesser competitive balance. This method was improved by Trandel and Maxcy (2011) , who realized that the calculation of ISD did not allow for home advantage, because it was based on the consideration that all the teams had the same ability, and, thus, had a probability of 0.5 (50%) to win any game against any team, either home or away. Trandel and Maxcy’s paper describes a formula that can be used to calculate a home-advantage-corrected ISD, and, therefore, a corrected measure of competitive balance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSD represents the competitive balance: the smaller the ratio the lesser the differences in team abilities and, therefore, greater competitive balance; the higher the ratio the greater the differences in team abilities and, hence, lesser competitive balance. This method was improved by Trandel and Maxcy (2011) , who realized that the calculation of ISD did not allow for home advantage, because it was based on the consideration that all the teams had the same ability, and, thus, had a probability of 0.5 (50%) to win any game against any team, either home or away. Trandel and Maxcy’s paper describes a formula that can be used to calculate a home-advantage-corrected ISD, and, therefore, a corrected measure of competitive balance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If draws are feasible, then we use the corresponding ISD = 1d/4G for a (2,1,0) points scheme, or 1dd+9/4/9G for a (3,1,0) points scheme, where d is the simulated probability of a draw in that season (Owen, , Equations (2′) and (3′), respectively). If H ≠ 0, we use the ISD expression derived by Trandel and Maxcy (, 10) that allows for home advantage…”
Section: Simulation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The home‐advantage‐corrected ISD calculated by Trandel and Maxcy () treats a draw, if feasible, as half a win. We therefore apply this form of ISD only to the case of home advantage with no draws or with draws treated as half a win.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N training and test sets are created and applied to the models 3. Draft Age interacting with Position Variable 1 x i, 10 Draft Age interacting with Position Variable 2 x i, 11 Draft Age interacting with Nationality Variable 3 x i, 12 Draft Age interacting with Nationality Variable 4 x i, 13 Overall Pick interacting with Position Variable 1 x i, 14 Overall Pick interacting with Position Variable 2 x i, 15 Overall Pick interacting with Nationality Variable 3 x i, 16 Overall Pick interacting with Nationality Variable 4…”
Section: Model Development: the Voting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works of Pollard [11] in 2005, and more recently, Doyle and Leard [12] in 2012 confirm that home teams consistently win more games. Trandel and Maxcy [13] derived a balanced league standard deviation formula of winning percentages that takes into account the home advantage. They used this new formula to recompute the standard deviation ratios for major sports leagues and they considered the competitive balance in the various leagues.…”
Section: Introduction To Ice Hockeymentioning
confidence: 99%