2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2005.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustment costs in labour markets and the distributional effects of trade liberalization: Analytics and calculations for Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for the elasticities of substitution in consumption have been adopted from Chan et al (2005) with permission from the authors. At the upper level of the nests, these values of elasticities are based on their assumptions and in line with central tendency estimates available in Marques (1990), Orcutt (1950), Piggot and Whalley (1985) and Shoven and Whalley (1992).…”
Section: Model Specification and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values for the elasticities of substitution in consumption have been adopted from Chan et al (2005) with permission from the authors. At the upper level of the nests, these values of elasticities are based on their assumptions and in line with central tendency estimates available in Marques (1990), Orcutt (1950), Piggot and Whalley (1985) and Shoven and Whalley (1992).…”
Section: Model Specification and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chan, Dung, Ghosh and Whalley (2005) examine the distributional impact of eliminating import tariffs using a static CGE model with various labour market scenarios assuming different adjustment costs. They find that Vietnam's import trade liberalisation is pro-rich and anti-poor when perfectly competitive labour markets are assumed since richer households tend to consume more imported goods while restricting labour mobility hurt poor and rural households who cannot benefit by moving to work in the higherpaying industrial service sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. For lack of precise information on the width of this cost, we follow Chan et al (2005) who postulate that migration costs are equal to 10% of the international migratory flow. For internal migration, the cost of labour mobility is obviously lower than international migration and we suppose that internal migration costs are equal to 5% of the internal migratory flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migration costs are modelled à la Chan et al (2005): when workers migrate from a region to another due to wage differentials, their net wage in the region of destination is lower than the effective wage in this region, and the difference is due to migration costs. According to the authors, this is equivalent to a reduction in a household's available working time in the region of destination and results in a reduction of his labour endowment.…”
Section: Migration Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%