2015
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n4p2861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustment of equations to predict the metabolizable energy of corn for meat type quails

Abstract: The metabolizable energy (ME) determination for foods used in quail diets, through metabolism assays, takes time, infrastructure and financial resources, which makes the development of prediction equations based on proximal composition of foods to estimate the ME values of particular interest. The objective of this study was to adjust the prediction equations of metabolizable energy (ME) of corn for quail. The chemical compositions of 12 maize varieties were determined and a metabolism assay was carried out in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CP contents found in this study resemble the average (7.88 %) proposed by Rostagno et al (2011) and are similar to those found by Pasquetti et al (2015). The ADF values were greater than 3.00 %, reaching 4.27 %.…”
Section: Metabolism Assaysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CP contents found in this study resemble the average (7.88 %) proposed by Rostagno et al (2011) and are similar to those found by Pasquetti et al (2015). The ADF values were greater than 3.00 %, reaching 4.27 %.…”
Section: Metabolism Assaysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The corn cultivars used in the metabolism assay showed DM values ranging from 86.57 % to 89.71 % (Table 4). Mineral matter contents ranged from 0.90 % to 1.32 %, corroborating the findings of Pasquetti et al (2015). The EE values varied from 3.32 % to 3.61 %, near the average (3.65 %) proposed by Rostagno et al (2011) and also consistent with the value (3.48 %) displayed in the NRC (2012).…”
Section: Metabolism Assaysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ME assayed in different species or breeds of poultry can vary. The animals used include growing chicks (Hill and Anderson, 1958 ; Waititu et al, 2018 ), layers (Mitchell and Haines, 1927 ; Zuber and Rodehutscord, 2017 ), roosters (Sibbald, 1975 ; Deng et al, 2016 ), turkeys (Leeson et al, 1974 ; Kozlowski et al, 2018 ), ducks (King et al, 1997 ; Kong and Adeola, 2010 ), geese (Wang et al, 2017a ), pigeons (Hullar et al, 1999 ; Sales and Janssens, 2003 ), and quails (Mandal et al, 2006 ; Pasquetti et al, 2015 ). In industry, however, the database ME values invariably rely on broiler, to a lesser extent, adult rooster bioassays, with ME values of many ingredients unavailable for minor species.…”
Section: Metabolizable Energy Bioassays and Factors Affecting Mementioning
confidence: 99%