2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62312-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
218
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
218
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypertension was increased in the latter group, which may explain why the overall incidence of cardiovascular events was similar in the two groups. Similar findings were reported in the TEAM trial (van de Velde et al 2011).…”
Section: Cardiovascular Adverse Eventssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hypertension was increased in the latter group, which may explain why the overall incidence of cardiovascular events was similar in the two groups. Similar findings were reported in the TEAM trial (van de Velde et al 2011).…”
Section: Cardiovascular Adverse Eventssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The trial had to be modified because the results of the IES were published while the TEAM trial was still ongoing, indicating that 5 years adjuvant tamoxifen might be considered as a suboptimal adjuvant treatment. The modified TEAM design compared long-term effects of exemestane monotherapy for 5 years with the tamoxifen/ exemestane 'switch' strategy in postmenopausal women with HR-positive breast cancer (van de Velde et al 2011).…”
Section: Adjuvant Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study design and population of the trial have previously been described in detail. 11 The current study is a side study of the TEAM trial, which is also known as the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter Lifestyle (TEAM-L) side study. This side study prospectively investigated lifestyle habits in a subset of patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 91-month follow-up data for IES031 showed that compared with TAM, exemestane significantly improved disease-free survival, and reduced the risks of local and distant recurrence, while significantly increasing the overall survival rate of ER + patients for unknown reasons. The results of a 2.75-year follow-up by TEAM also showed that, compared with TAM, exemestane significantly reduced the risks of recurrence and distant metastasis (28). A clinical study (29) showed that with regard to the postmenopausal BC patients, when TAM treatment generated resistance, the application of second-line drugs (AIs) would still be effective.…”
Section: A B C D Ementioning
confidence: 99%