2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-012-0637-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant thyroid remnant ablation in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma confined to the thyroid: a comparison of ablation success with different activities of radioiodine (I-131)

Abstract: The results of remnant ablation were satisfactory with all activities applied. Although after the first application of I-131 the activity of 100 mCi is significantly more effective in thyroid ablation than the administration of 30-50 mCi and 75 mCi, the ablation rates between all the three groups are similar (almost equal) after the second application. Thus, the activity to be administered may depend on patients' characteristics and a detailed consideration of the merits and demerits of each I-131 activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in accordance with a study by El-Refaei et al, which investigated treatment outcome after re-ablation using both low-and high I-131activities, and found no difference in overall treatment success between these two study groups [9]. Similarly, another study, concluded that although high I-131 activities used in the first application are significantly more effective in thyroid ablation than low-and intermediate activities, it is not the case in re-ablation [14]. Long-term side effects, including the possibility for secondary malignancies, as well as increased radiation exposure to medical staff, must be taken into consideration when using high activities [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are in accordance with a study by El-Refaei et al, which investigated treatment outcome after re-ablation using both low-and high I-131activities, and found no difference in overall treatment success between these two study groups [9]. Similarly, another study, concluded that although high I-131 activities used in the first application are significantly more effective in thyroid ablation than low-and intermediate activities, it is not the case in re-ablation [14]. Long-term side effects, including the possibility for secondary malignancies, as well as increased radiation exposure to medical staff, must be taken into consideration when using high activities [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The most effective cost-benefit strategy, the rationale for re-ablation, as well as the reablation I-131 activity in these patients is still a subject of an ongoing debate [8][9]14]. Malick and colleagues concluded that low activity I-131 in post-thyroidectomy ablation using 1110 MBq (30 mCi) was effective [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second, third and fourth 131 I treatments were administered orally, with 120, 150 and 150 mCi, respectively. The rate of successful ablation was in agreement with results from a previous study, which stated that 30-50 mCi, 75 mCi or 100 mCi as a second 131 I treatment achieved successful ablation in patients with DTC confined to the thyroid (27). This may be partially explained by the change in size of remnant thyroid tissue, which is expected to become significantly smaller following a high initial dose of 131 I.…”
Section: Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A recent study on 259 DTC patients confined to the thyroid has reported that 100 mCi of RAI was significantly more effective in thyroid ablation than 30-50 mCi and also superior to 75 mCi (Prpic et al 2012). However, ablation rates were nearly similar after a second RAI dose.…”
Section: Recent Reviews Of New England Journal Of Medicine Articles Bmentioning
confidence: 96%