COMMENT & RESPONSE
Ketamine for the Treatment of DepressionTo the Editor We congratulate Sanacora et al 1 for the publication of their consensus statement in JAMA Psychiatry. The growing amount of literature on this topic has generated interest among patients and physicians, which called for such an important document as the basis for decision-making societies, health care professionals, and regulatory authorities. Until official approval of depression as an indication, offlabel uses by medical experts assuming legal, scientific, and medical hazards will increase. On the other hand, ketamine clinics or ketamine wellness centers already offer ketamine as outpatient treatment with unscientific and dangerous methods. To overcome the lack of regulation, consensus statements and their dissemination are of utmost importance.Off-label administration of psychopharmaceuticals is very common in adult psychiatric practice, eg, quetiapine as an augmentative antidepressant, and pivotal in child and adolescent psychiatry. A previous study in the United States estimated that around 21% of all prescriptions in 2001 were off-label, with the highest rates for anticonvulsants (74%), antipsychotics (60%), and antibiotics (41%). 2 Furthermore, figures showed that a substantial amount of off-label prescriptions (73%) lacked scientific support. Indeed, recommendations on off-label use have suggested that evaluation of evidence to justify an off-label use is of utmost importance for prescribers, and justification of offlabel prescriptions is strongest when rigorous research supports it. 3 While existing studies and this consensus statement on ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression warrant ethical standards in off-label treatment as far as short-term improvements are concerned, long-term use data on preventing relapses are missing. Hence, the suggestion by Sanacora et al 1 to discontinue ketamine based on lack of efficacy is crucial. Moreover, current literature is scarce in conditions other than major depression, so thorough patient evaluation is indispensable. Hence, close psychiatric examination and evaluation contradict ketamine administration by nonpsychiatric specialists.An ethical and legal framework for off-label use in the European Union shows that demonstration of a "careful physician," eg, in a courtroom, is crucial to avoid medical malpractice. 4 This includes standards in patient information and informed consent. Although explaining ketamine treatment to patients with acute depression might be a complicated task, ethi-cal and legal standards demand informed consent, which is well acknowledged in the preprocedural evaluation table in the article. 1 We recently published an informed consent form available for clinical use. 5 This might further promote high standards in antidepressant ketamine treatment and avoid clinical errors, which could be a potential setback to propagation of a beneficial treatment for treatment-resistant patients.