Administrative Decentralization: The Transfer of Competency from The Ministry of Education to General Directorates

Self Cite

Today it became a huge challenge for Human Resource Managers to retain the employees for longer time of period and decrease the rate of employee turnover. The main research objective is to find out the correlation between job satisfaction and employee turnover intention in private hospital in Erbil. A quantitative method was used to analyze the current study. 144 participants were involved in this study from private hospital in Erbil. The correlation between job satisfaction factor as independent factor and turnover as dependent factor, the value of R for the Job satisfaction is =.386** which indicates that turnover is a positive and weak correlation with turnover intention. The coefficients analysis for this study, the value Beta for turnover is = .386> 0.01, which supported the research hypothesis. This study showed that the there is a positive correlation between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Finally, on the turnover intentions of private hospital personnel in Erbil, most of them would quit in case if they have a better opportunities.

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The outcome of the study proved that managers are required to execute long term plan in order to be able to avoid high employee turnover. Identifying the level of job satisfaction considers an important factor to decrease rate of employee turnover (Sabir et al 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Employee Turnover Intention and Job Satisfaction

Ali¹,

Anwar²

2021

Self Cite

“…Organizations can benefit from engaged employees in a variety of ways (Faraj et al 2021), including less employee turnover and increased job satisfaction (Hamza et al 2021). According to (Hameed & Anwar, 2018), there is debate as to whether work engagement is defined as a behavior or an attitude statement from a psychological standpoint (Ismael et al 2021); however, (Jamal et al 2021) stated that work engagement can be defined as both behavioral and attitudinally stated for the purposes of the current study and in (Sabir et al 2021)accordance with a strong theoretical foundation (Saleh et al 2021). Job satisfaction is described by (Sorguli et al 2021)as the emotion or sensation that a person has about their current job (Talim, et al 2021).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 98%

Work Engagement: How Does Employee Work Engagement influence Employee Satisfaction?

Ali¹,

Anwar²

2021

Self Cite

The goal of this research is to look into the link between job happiness and work engagement. The goal of the study was to look into the relationship between (equal opportunities, personal influence, nature of career, development opportunity, employee recognition, work challenge, supervisor behavior, ethics and integrity, and job empowerment) and job satisfaction in Erbil's private companies. In order to examine the association between work engagement and job satisfaction, the researcher employed a quantitative research method, but only 108 people took part in the current study. To assess the association between variables, the researcher employed multiple regression analysis. The researcher discovered that among the other work engagement aspects, workplace challenge had the greatest value =.671 and P-value =.000, indicating that many employees in private organizations are engaged to their jobs due to time management, overburdening tasks, and communication. This study emphasized the importance of workplace challenges in motivating employees to become more involved in their organizations. Employee engagement is defined as a good attitude toward work and the degree to which an individual is committed to the company. Only a small number of employees from private enterprises in Kurdistan took part in this survey, which limits the study's findings.

“…Cost Leadership Strategy: This strategy concentrates on low cost in terms of businesses' activities and could functionalized as low pricing, low input (Sabir et al 2021), experience, the design of the products, economies of scale and the design of the process (Saleh et al 2021). Concerning low pricing is the process of creating similar product in terms of features to competitors but in lower price (Sorguli et al 2021).…”

Section: Fig1: Generic Competitive Strategy Porter (1980)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Porter’s Generic Competitive Strategies and its influence on the Competitive Advantage

Ali¹,

Anwar²

2021

Self Cite

The ever-changing competitive business climate poses major hurdles to investment businesses, particularly the banking sector, as well as any other firm in Iraq's Kurdistan area, and business managers have been striving to stay competitive. Porter demonstrated that pursuing a competitive generic strategy can lead to a stronger competitive advantage. The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of Porter's generic strategies on competitive advantage in the investment industry, specifically in the banking sector. Also, which strategy is superior to the others in terms of gaining a competitive advantage in the investing industry? The data in this study was analyzed using a qualitative method. In Erbil, a random sample method was employed to collect data from private banks. The sample size for this study was 128 units, whereas the population was roughly 210 units. According to multiple regression analysis, the researcher discovered that cost leadership has a strong predictive value for competitive advantage (Beta is weight 0.708, p.001), indicating that cost leadership approach will have a direct beneficial impact on competitive advantage. The initial hypothesis was confirmed as a result of these findings. In terms of the second research hypothesis, differentiation strategy has a weak positive influence on competitive advantage (Beta is weight 0.180, p.001), implying that differentiation strategy has a weak positive impact on competitive advantage. The second hypothesis was supported based on these findings, and the third research hypothesis was supported based on these findings: focus strategy has significantly predicted competitive advantage (Beta is weight 0.102, p.001), indicating that focus strategy will have a weak positive impact on competitive advantage.