2020
DOI: 10.18572/2071-1166-2020-1-49-52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Administrative Discretion in Exercising of Control and Supervisory Powers by Executive Authorities

Abstract: В статье рассматриваются формы административного усмотрения органов исполнительной власти при реализации государственного контроля и надзора. Развивая типологию административного усмотрения, автор предлагает выделить такие формы административного усмотрения при реализации контрольно-надзорных полномочий, как выбор объема, способа контроля и оценка обстоятельств, выступающих основанием принятия управленческого решения при реализации государственного контроля и надзора. Ключевые слова: административное усмотрени… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limits and expediency of administrative discretion are the most pressing issues in studying it by domestic scientists. Agamagomedova speaks about the need to determine the optimal level of discretion when public administration bodies exercise their powers [8]. Milshin notes that granting the right to discretion to a public administration body should meet the criterion of expediency, as well as be controlled by state bodies and public entities [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limits and expediency of administrative discretion are the most pressing issues in studying it by domestic scientists. Agamagomedova speaks about the need to determine the optimal level of discretion when public administration bodies exercise their powers [8]. Milshin notes that granting the right to discretion to a public administration body should meet the criterion of expediency, as well as be controlled by state bodies and public entities [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%