2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Administrative healthcare data to predict performance status in lung cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance status (PS), as a subjective composite to evaluate the patient’s wellness, is a key factor reflecting the patient’s ability to carry on normal activities. Several previous studies have reported the role of PS as a prognostic signature impacting the survival rate in different age categories [ 38 41 ]. Regarding medical urgency associated with late diagnosis of advanced disease, we found that SVCS, as well as pleurisy syndrome, were all associated with poor survival in patients at the different stage categories of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance status (PS), as a subjective composite to evaluate the patient’s wellness, is a key factor reflecting the patient’s ability to carry on normal activities. Several previous studies have reported the role of PS as a prognostic signature impacting the survival rate in different age categories [ 38 41 ]. Regarding medical urgency associated with late diagnosis of advanced disease, we found that SVCS, as well as pleurisy syndrome, were all associated with poor survival in patients at the different stage categories of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research, Andreano et al [53] proposed a Logistic Regression model for predicting the ECOG PS in lung cancer patients using administrative healthcare data including 4488 patients with 11 features. The target feature was dichotomized as "poor" (ECOG PS between 3 and 5) and "good" (ECOG PS between 0 and 2) based on all other factors in the dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%