2020
DOI: 10.1515/agms-2020-0110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admissibility versus Ap-Conditions on Regular Trees

Abstract: We show that the combination of doubling and (1, p)-Poincaré inequality is equivalent to a version of the Ap-condition on rooted K-ary trees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A tree in [BBGS17,NgWa20] (or a weighted real line in [BBK06,BBS20]) is doubling, supports a Poincaré inequality and has more than one end.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tree in [BBGS17,NgWa20] (or a weighted real line in [BBK06,BBS20]) is doubling, supports a Poincaré inequality and has more than one end.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, analysis on K-regular trees has been under development, see [3,21,22,23,20,27]. Let G be a K-regular tree with a set of vertices V and a set of edges E for some K ≥ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whenever u is a measurable function on B(x, r) and g is an upper gradient of u, where u B(x,r) := − ´B(x,r) udµ = 1 µ(B(x,r)) ´B(x,r) udµ. The validity of a p-Poincaré inequality for X has very recently been characterized via a Muckenhoupt-type condition under a doubling condition on (X, d, µ), see [23] for more information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%