2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12464-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admission cardiotocography: a randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
82
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Impey et al [6] found 32 % traces as abnormal at admission. In Scottish study, abnormal traces were found in 14 % cases, and in our study, 63 % mothers had abnormal fetal heart rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Impey et al [6] found 32 % traces as abnormal at admission. In Scottish study, abnormal traces were found in 14 % cases, and in our study, 63 % mothers had abnormal fetal heart rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Admission cardiotocography is widely used as labor admission test to identify pregnancies that might benefit from continuous fetal electronic monitoring, but it has low sensitivity and positive predictive value and does not improve neonatal outcome in routine use 1,2 . Addition of fetal vibroacoustic stimulation (VAS) has been reported to increase the sensitivity and decrease false-positive results 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 30 minute CTG on admission to primarily exclude fetal risk and verify contractions is considered useful [43]. If the pregnancy is risk-free and the CTG performed during earlystage labor was unremarkable, the interval for electronic fetal surveillance intrapartum can range from once every 30 minutes up to a maximum of every two hours (minimum duration of reading at least 30 minutes); if it is not possible to take a reading, monitoring should be done by auscultation (at least 10 minutes with strict documentation) [41,90].…”
Section: Indications Intrapartummentioning
confidence: 99%