1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70081-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admission Decisions in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients at Low Risk for Myocardial Infarction: Patient Versus Physician Preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients' decisions are influenced by values and biases that may lead them to choose a course of action that is at odds with traditional scientific analyses of what is considered to be in their best interest, [10][11][12] and patients and physicians may disagree on preferred treatment options. 13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients' decisions are influenced by values and biases that may lead them to choose a course of action that is at odds with traditional scientific analyses of what is considered to be in their best interest, [10][11][12] and patients and physicians may disagree on preferred treatment options. 13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is highlighted by the perhaps surprising finding that when presented with relevant information, patients are often able to choose the path that is safest, involves the fewest procedures, and is least time‐consuming 16 . When asked about their preference and risk tolerance in a low‐risk chest pain scenario, 43% of patients preferred discharge compared to 3% of physicians 17 . Despite the clear preference of patients and parents of patients for topical anesthesia before peripheral IV placement, many clinicians do not provide this therapy, likely due to false perceptions of efficacy, patient preference, and delays in care 18 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, if an undetectable presentation TnI had been used for decision making, four MI would have been missed (NPV 99.4% (98.4% to 99.8%)); however, approximately 60% of patients would have been eligible for early discharge. There is evidence of significant between-patient variation in risk tolerance for adverse events after ED chest pain assessment,14 of variation between physicians in risk tolerance15 and of mismatch between patient and physician risk tolerance 16. As 100% diagnostic accuracy is impossible and missed MI is among the most common malpractice claims in emergency medicine,17 building consensus about an acceptable level of risk would assist in developing effective and appropriate chest pain assessment pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%