2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1324692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admittance of metal–insulator–semiconductor tunnel contacts in the presence of donor–acceptor mixed interface states and interface reaction

Abstract: The admittance of a metal–insulator–semiconductor tunnel contact is evaluated considering the presence of donor–acceptor mixed interface states and chemical reaction in the interfacial oxide layer. Both the voltage and frequency behavior of the device has been studied. It has been found that, due to interface reaction, the current, conductance, and capacitance of the device drift considerably with time yielding an aging effect. Further, it is revealed that the dependence of the conductance and capacitance on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,29,37,38 Although resulting expressions of the admittance are quite similar to Equation 12, the microscopic response times of localized interface states are quite different: a capture-emission time constant is derived from Shockley-Read-Hall parameters 22 in the former models, [37][38][39][40] in contrast with the tunnel response time (Eqn 7) in Gomila's model. 36 …”
Section: Kinetic Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…25,29,37,38 Although resulting expressions of the admittance are quite similar to Equation 12, the microscopic response times of localized interface states are quite different: a capture-emission time constant is derived from Shockley-Read-Hall parameters 22 in the former models, [37][38][39][40] in contrast with the tunnel response time (Eqn 7) in Gomila's model. 36 …”
Section: Kinetic Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, the separation of a metal and a dielectric material carrying opposite electrostatic charges induces the open-circuit voltage in a conventional TENG. Metal–insulating–semiconductor (MIS) TENGs are based on an electronic excitation process under nonequilibrium conditions, which cannot be explained by the electrostatic introduction theory. Compared to the MS TENG, only an insulating layer is added between the metal and the semiconductor , which can generate tribotunneling current based on the quantum mechanical electron tunneling of the insulating layer. The current generation mechanism is as follows: First, triboelectric charge is generated at the metal–insulator surface .…”
Section: Metal–insulating–semiconductor Tengmentioning
confidence: 99%