2012
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2012.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admixture and population structure in Mexican-Mestizos based on paternal lineages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
64
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
11
64
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be because notwithstanding the Spanish Amerindian component, it is also likely that Chilean population has a greater European component 24 than Mexican population. 25 The results of this study, supported by previous studies, suggest that polymorphism 5557G>A in Mexican population in particular, and perhaps in Latin American population in general, confers an increase in the risk for breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This could be because notwithstanding the Spanish Amerindian component, it is also likely that Chilean population has a greater European component 24 than Mexican population. 25 The results of this study, supported by previous studies, suggest that polymorphism 5557G>A in Mexican population in particular, and perhaps in Latin American population in general, confers an increase in the risk for breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…While the mean estimate of admixture time for the American group was somewhat higher than expected (980 years), the lower bound of 340 years ago is reasonable. The admixture fraction estimate for the American group is also consistent with existing literature [29], [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Inaccuracy in the rate might also be due to ascertainment bias or the incomplete detection of the mutations at the sequencing phase. While the mean estimate is slightly lower than is found in prior work [28], [29], [30], the 95% confidence interval overlaps estimates from the prior literature. The mean estimate of the admixture time t 1 was 48 generations with a 95% confidence interval of 17 to 150 generations.…”
Section: Real Snp Datacontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…To be selected, the publications had to meet the following criteria: (1) published in peer‐reviewed journals, (2) with independent data, and (3) written in English. We do not include studies based on mtDNA or Y‐chromosome markers, or studies using short tandem repeats, also known as STRs, such as those conducted by Martínez‐Cortés et al (2012), Rangel‐Villalobos et al (2008), and Salazar‐Flores et al (2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%