2001
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.155.5.566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent Immunization Practices

Abstract: Most physicians supported adolescent immunization efforts. Barriers preventing adolescent immunization included financial barriers, record scattering, lack of tracking and recall, and missed opportunities. School-based immunization programs were acceptable to most physicians, despite concerns about continuity of care. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions that have successfully increased infant immunization rates are also effective for adolescents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, pediatric clinics may be better equipped to administer childhood and adolescent vaccines given that they exclusively serve these populations. For example, pediatricians may be more accustomed to and knowledgeable about administering catch-up doses of childhood vaccines than are family practice clinicians [1820]. Why HPV vaccine might pose an exception to this general trend is unclear, but our findings corroborate previous work showing higher HPV vaccine initiation and completion in family practice versus pediatric clinics [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In general, pediatric clinics may be better equipped to administer childhood and adolescent vaccines given that they exclusively serve these populations. For example, pediatricians may be more accustomed to and knowledgeable about administering catch-up doses of childhood vaccines than are family practice clinicians [1820]. Why HPV vaccine might pose an exception to this general trend is unclear, but our findings corroborate previous work showing higher HPV vaccine initiation and completion in family practice versus pediatric clinics [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Under the Supplementary insurance, the reimbursement was only 50 euro per dose (75 euro in case of preferential treatment). Reducing out of pocket costs has been shown to improve vaccination uptake for various children, adolescent and adult vaccines [4,12-15]. In addition, the administrative procedure of each of the reimbursement regimes might also have been important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-economic differences in HPV vaccination uptake are particularly relevant since people with low SES have a higher risk of contracting cervical cancer [23,24]. An obvious explanation might be the financial barrier caused by the co-payments [4,12-15]. However, most likely other reasons have also played a role, such as a differential influence of media attention on people with different socio-economic backgrounds or advertising being more directed to certain categories of people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may indicate that while pediatricians and family medicine physicians are receiving similar efforts for most of the AFIX-related quality improvement strategies, there is less emphasis in the long-term follow-up for family medicine. One possible explanation is that pediatric clinics account for the majority of general vaccinations administered 24,25 and have more infrastructure for data monitoring programs including systems to track undervaccinated children. 26 As with all of the variables, it is unclear what the temporal association is between HPV knowledge and AFIX-related activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%