2009
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent-parent interactions and attitudes around screen time and sugary drink consumption: a qualitative study

Abstract: BackgroundLittle is known about how adolescents and their parents interact and talk about some of the key lifestyle behaviors that are associated with overweight and obesity, such as screen time (ST) and sugary drink (SD) consumption. This qualitative study aimed to explore adolescents' and parents' perceptions, attitudes, and interactions in regards to these topics.MethodsUsing an exploratory approach, semi-structured focus groups were conducted separately with adolescents and (unrelated) parents. Participant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, when parents report difficulty in influencing their child's physical activity the likelihood of their child exceeding screen time recommendations appears to be higher. These findings are consistent with qualitative research which has found that parents of adolescents struggle to control their child's screen time [40]. As in previous studies [41], higher levels of maternal education were also associated with limiting children's screen time, among preschool and younger children in particular.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Hence, when parents report difficulty in influencing their child's physical activity the likelihood of their child exceeding screen time recommendations appears to be higher. These findings are consistent with qualitative research which has found that parents of adolescents struggle to control their child's screen time [40]. As in previous studies [41], higher levels of maternal education were also associated with limiting children's screen time, among preschool and younger children in particular.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Yet notably, parents of older adolescents appeared to institute fewer rules than parents of pre- to early adolescents (Bélanger et al, 2011; Hattersley et al, 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Of course this approach may not work for all youth, as some parents indicated that conversations about screen-time limits were confrontational and frequently escalated into shouting and arguments (Hattersley et al, 2009). When conflict ensued, many parents often eased the restriction, which, interestingly, youth attributed to a poor strategy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Another qualitative study based on interviews with parents also indicated that sugary drink consumption among adolescents could be managed by controlling availability or access and by providing alternatives (particularly water). 14 Results from group interviews involving parents of low and high socioeconomic status (SES) indicated that high-SES parents were more likely to report restricting soft drink intake in the home than parents from low-SES groups, who were instead concerned with having pleasant family mealtimes and that an adequate quantity of food was consumed. 13 This disparity between parents based on SES was not apparent in the current study; however, data were not analyzed separately according to SES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Studies that focus on parental expectations and rules regarding beverage consumption for EAs from a qualitative perspective are limited. 13,14 More often, studies address the quantitative relationship between rules and beverage consumption. [15][16][17] For example, restrictive parenting practices were negatively associated with sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among adolescents, 15 whereas a positive association was observed between soft drink intake and low restriction rules 16 or permissiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%