2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent Shared Decision-Making: Where We Have Been and Where We are Going

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, despite the increasing emphasis on patient decision-making and patient preference, only 3 of the 11 quantitative studies collaborated with patients on attribute selection for the CR program. 60 Excluding patients from attribute selection may result in selection bias and, therefore may lead to biased results for patient preference. 17 Fourth, only English and Chinese studies were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, despite the increasing emphasis on patient decision-making and patient preference, only 3 of the 11 quantitative studies collaborated with patients on attribute selection for the CR program. 60 Excluding patients from attribute selection may result in selection bias and, therefore may lead to biased results for patient preference. 17 Fourth, only English and Chinese studies were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BIS describes a broad cluster of children's interests, and includes basic needs, emotional development, play and pleasure, to live a long life and to have a relationship with a parent [37]. Multiple approaches to decision-making have been described and all focus on the key principles of the best interests of the child in the context of their family and the minimisation of harm [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless there are ethical and practical challenges in many clinical situations. Ethical tools, such as the Zone of Parental Discretion (ZPD) [41], have been developed to help clinicians address these ethically complicated cases [38,41]. The ZPD provides a way to explore difficult decisions and uncertainty, and to balance parent authority and children's best interests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%