2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-00756-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent smoking, alcohol use, inebriation, and use of narcotics during the Covid-19 pandemic

Abstract: Background The aim of the study was to investigate how general family relations, reported changes in family interaction and involvement with peers during the Covid-19 pandemic, and following rules and recommendations during the pandemic relate to adolescent smoking, alcohol use, inebriation, and use of narcotics during Covid-19. Methods An online national survey of Swedish adolescents (n = 1818) aged 15–19 years was conducted in June 2020. Hierarc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, exposure to violence was positively, though not significantly, associated with alcohol or drug use service need in the pandemic period. While these findings should be considered exploratory, our overall findings and the stratified analyses complement those few studies that have similarly considered risk and protective factors and substance use during the pandemic [ 14 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, exposure to violence was positively, though not significantly, associated with alcohol or drug use service need in the pandemic period. While these findings should be considered exploratory, our overall findings and the stratified analyses complement those few studies that have similarly considered risk and protective factors and substance use during the pandemic [ 14 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Crucially, few existing studies systematically integrated known risk and protective factors into their designs [14][15][16], despite their established effects on youth substance use and the pandemic's impact on these factors. One early pandemic study found that adolescents' alcohol and cannabis use increased, with peer-reputation concerns being significant predictors of their social contexts for substance use (i.e., alone, with friends via technology) [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers predicted and reported negative long-term consequences among children and adolescents—particularly excessive recreational screen time, poor diet, physical inactivity, and poor sleep, but also increases in substance use, the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, and suicidal thoughts [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. However, a few reported that restrictions actually resulted in decreases in alcohol consumption and norm-breaking behaviors and that adolescents showed resilience [ 25 , 43 , 44 ]. Hafstad and Augusti [ 45 ], in their comment in The Lancet Psychiatry in 2021, drew attention to the fact that changes in adolescents’ mental health and risk behaviors during the pandemic cannot and should not be simply interpreted as consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictions—increased psychological distress levels could be measured in adolescents even before the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family environment has been particularly affected during the pandemic, with global studies reporting increased rates of domestic violence and strained parent-child relationships (51)(52)(53). This also affects the likelihood of substance abuse: a Swedish study showed that adolescents with higher family con ict and tense relationship with parents had higher risks of substance abuse (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CD-RISC-25 scale is designed to explore ve factors related to resilience as personal competence, tolerance and strength, positiveness, control and spiritual in uences. For the CD-RISC-25 in our sample (n=657), the median was 54 and the observed distribution of the scores by quartile was Q1 [0-39], Q2 [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], Q3 [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] and Q4 [70-100].…”
Section: Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%