Adolescent Views on Comprehensive Health Risk Assessment and Counseling: Assessing Gender Differences

Abstract

Purpose Adolescence is an important time for the detection of health risk behaviors and factors with subsequent counseling and intervention. Limited research has examined adolescent perceptions of comprehensive health risk assessments (HRAs) and counseling with an assessment of gender differences. Methods Participants were identified using Florida’s Medicaid and State Children’s Health Insurance Program databases. A total of 35 low-income, racially/ethnically diverse adolescents (ages 14–18 years) participated in eight focus groups stratified by gender. Adolescents completed an internet-based, tablet-administered, comprehensive HRA and then participated in a semi-structured interview. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a multi-step, team-based approach applying grounded theory to determine major themes. Results Male adolescents desired less parental involvement, had less understanding of the protections of clinical confidentiality and the need for comprehensive HRA, and placed greater emphasis on the importance of professional appearance. In contrast, more females valued face-to-face interactions and stressed the importance of concern from the health risk assessor. Overall, adolescents placed importance on their relationship with the health risk assessor, and on valuing trust, confidentiality, and nonjudgmental care. Adolescents preferred to complete HRAs in clinical, private, and professional settings, and reported that tablet technology supported their confidentially in completing the HRA. Furthermore, they stressed the importance of autonomy and learning about the health risk outcomes for risk reduction. Conclusions Gender differences exist in adolescent perceptions of comprehensive HRAs. Adolescent perceptions of HRAs support their use in confidential primary care settings using modalities that emphasize nonjudgmental, private care, and the use of communication techniques that respect adolescents’ autonomy to change health risks.

Self-Consent for HIV Prevention Research Involving Sexual and Gender Minority Youth

“…They did emphasize that research team members should be patient and nonjudgmental, encourage questions, give time to consider options, and engender trust (Kadivar et al, 2014) and responded positively to the idea of a peer advocate who could present their options in an unbiased manner.…”

SBIRT-A: Adapting SBIRT to Maximize Developmental Fit for Adolescents in Primary Care

“…Second, adolescents should be supportively encouraged to talk directly with caregivers regarding the nature of their SU involvement as a first step toward help-seeking and behavior change (Ford, English, & Sigman, 2004). Adolescents are most likely to disclose SU behavior with PC physicians whom they perceive to be credible sources of health information and genuinely concerned for patients’ personal well-being (Kadivar et al, 2014), and when confidentiality is assured (Ford et al, 1997). Physicians are best positioned to convey these messages by interacting with adolescents in one-on-one sessions from a youth-centered, strength-based perspective (Sanders & Munford, 2014) during which they convey interest in adolescents’ personal qualities, aptitudes, resiliencies, and potential for success.…”

Improving Adolescent Health Risk Assessment: A Multi-method Pilot Study

“…Results of the adolescent focus groups were recently published [16]. The adolescents (n = 34) were diverse, with half (50.0 %) male, 55.9 % African-American, 29.4 % Hispanic and evenly ranging in ages from 14 to 18 years.…”

“…Recruitment of adolescent focus group participants using Florida’s Medicaid and State Children’s Health Insurance Program databases resulted in the recruitment of 35 racially/ethnically diverse adolescents to 8 focus groups and is reported in its entirety elsewhere. [13, 16, 37] Office staff and providers were recruited to participate in semi-structured focus group interviews led by trained moderators and co-moderators [1]. The purpose of these interviews was to acquire information about offices’ and practitioners’ past experiences and attitudes about comprehensive HRA screening and counseling and elucidate barriers and facilitators.…”