2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents’ metalinguistic reflections on the academic register in speech and writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
22
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the continued work to make academic‐language skills visible, we must also be aware of the threat posed by the deficit paradigm that would situate these skills as more valuable than the home literacy skills that learners bring to school. Beyond the language of school, preadolescent and adolescent students participate in many complex ways of using language (e.g., youth, religious, or sports discourses), and therefore, pedagogy needs to value, recognize, and build on students' existing knowledge of outside‐of‐school language to scaffold the expansion of the particular repertoire relevant for learning at school (Phillips Galloway, Stude, & Uccelli, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the continued work to make academic‐language skills visible, we must also be aware of the threat posed by the deficit paradigm that would situate these skills as more valuable than the home literacy skills that learners bring to school. Beyond the language of school, preadolescent and adolescent students participate in many complex ways of using language (e.g., youth, religious, or sports discourses), and therefore, pedagogy needs to value, recognize, and build on students' existing knowledge of outside‐of‐school language to scaffold the expansion of the particular repertoire relevant for learning at school (Phillips Galloway, Stude, & Uccelli, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a later outcome of this research line, we could envision a pedagogically informative tool that would serve to make school‐relevant language skills visible to teachers and students. Instead of a tool intended to measure individual performance, a desirable scenario would be to develop one that offers a classroom portrait as part of a comprehensive approach to understand the linguistic composition of a class, including classroom discourse observations and data on students' voices and reflections about the language of school (Phillips Galloway et al., ). Far from attempting to assess individual students, our goal is to develop tools to support teachers in being more attuned to the language needs of their students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers have the agency to assume or resist the identities ascribed to them by the language of an academic text, which in turn may be related to their levels of reading engagement or persistence (Heller & Morek, 2015;Phillips Galloway, Stude, & Uccelli, 2015;van Lier & Walqui, 2012). Existing psychological models of reading comprehension conceptualize reader engagement through the lens of motivation, often failing to acknowledge the potential role of reader identity alignment or misalignment (Frankel & Fields, 2019;Hall, 2016).…”
Section: Acknowledgment Of the Role Of Reader Identity And Agency In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to examining how students approach linguistic data and tasks, several studies (e.g., Galloway, Stude, Uccelli 2015;Lo Duca 2004, 2012a, 2012b, 2018a, 2018bMyhill, Jones, Wilson 2016; Svalberg 2015; Toth 2019; Watson, Newman 2017) point towards the importance of discussion based on the observation of linguistic data in developing the language awareness of students. Discussion enhances metalinguistic understanding by directing the student's attention to relations between form, meaning and function (Myhill, Jones, Wilson 2016, 37), and exploiting the student's implicit competences and natural curiosity towards language (Lo Duca 2004, 2018a.…”
Section: Collaborative Construction Of Language Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%