2012
DOI: 10.1080/1533256x.2012.728485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents' Perspectives on Strengths-Based Group Work and Group Cohesion in Residential Treatment for Substance Abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be the case that helping youth recognize the potential for strengths in these areas, and facilitate their reengagement in these settings, can promote resiliency and improve overall functioning. In fact, this line of reasoning has been supported previously by qualitative reports of adolescents engaged in the current residential treatment program for substance abuse (Harris et al, 2012b). Adolescents in this study reported that the strengths-based components of this substance abuse program provided them opportunities to reengage in areas of their lives that they had previously disengaged from (e.g., sports, writing, music, strong family relationships, academics) due to reported substance abuse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be the case that helping youth recognize the potential for strengths in these areas, and facilitate their reengagement in these settings, can promote resiliency and improve overall functioning. In fact, this line of reasoning has been supported previously by qualitative reports of adolescents engaged in the current residential treatment program for substance abuse (Harris et al, 2012b). Adolescents in this study reported that the strengths-based components of this substance abuse program provided them opportunities to reengage in areas of their lives that they had previously disengaged from (e.g., sports, writing, music, strong family relationships, academics) due to reported substance abuse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Preliminary findings from several studies have provided promising results indicating that these programs may be effective in reducing substance use (e.g., Catalano, Arthur, Hawkins, Berglund, & Olson, 1998;Durlak, Weissberg, & Pachan, 2010;Schwartz et al, 2010;Tebes et al, 2007). Preliminary findings also suggest that the addition of strengths-based approaches may enhance established treatment protocols for adolescents engaged in residential programming for substance abuse problems (Harris, Brazeau, Clarkson, Brownlee, & Rawana, 2012a, 2012bHarris, Brazeau, Rawana, Brownlee, & Mazmanian, 2016). Such treatment programs aim to improve overall functioning of youth through helping them identify their strengths, develop their strengths, and apply their strengths in an adaptive manner to help minimize problem behaviors such as substance abuse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At the school level, interventions to prevent substance use can be categorized into three types: (1) social resistance skills training; (2) normative education; and (3) competence enhancement skills training (Griffin & Botvin, 2010). An emerging body of literature shows the need for interventions for adolescents with substance use, and the benefits of group treatment and group work as effective modalities (Brinson, 1995;D'Amico et al, 2012;Engle, Macgowan, Wagner, & Amrhein, 2010;Harris, Brazeau, Clarkson, Brownlee, & Rawana, 2012;Jenson, Howard, & Vaughn, 2004;Kaminer, 2005;Macgowan & Wagner, 2005;Waldron & Kaminer, 2004), however, not all of the studies have empirically evaluated treatment efficacy. For example, Engle and Macgowan (2009) note that only two studies met criteria for possible efficacy among the 13 adolescent group treatments for which substance use outcomes were evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, several group process factors have been identified as important mechanisms of change in the group therapy literature. Specifically, group cohesion (Burlingame, McClendon, & Alonso, 2011; Harris, Brazeau, Clarkson, Brownlee, & Rawana, 2012), client program satisfaction (Sobell, Sobell, & Agrawal, 2009), and group leader empathy (Engle, Macgowan, Wagner, & Amrhein, 2010; Johnson, Burlingame, Olsen, Davies, & Gleave, 2005) are key group processes that predict positive behavior change. However, very little is known about group process factors associated with successful voluntary school-based intervention programs or whether these processes are affected by the group’s ethnic composition.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%