2001
DOI: 10.1080/13676260120075428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents' Risk Activities, Risk Hierarchies and the Influence of Religiosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the use of substances, the results of our study are in accordance with previous studies: the association with religiosity is relatively stronger than for most other behaviours 6 18. The inverse association with sexual behaviour is also in accordance with most previous studies 18–20.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Regarding the use of substances, the results of our study are in accordance with previous studies: the association with religiosity is relatively stronger than for most other behaviours 6 18. The inverse association with sexual behaviour is also in accordance with most previous studies 18–20.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Membership in a religious group, such as youth group, was negatively correlated with risk-taking, as opposed to membership in a sports group which was positively correlated with risk-taking. In addition, youths' reported religious beliefs were only weakly associated with risk inhibition while membership in a church or faith community was significant in reducing risk behaviors (Abbott-Chapman & Denholm, 2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A given religion or religious belief merely denotes that adherents subscribes to a given belief system. In comparison, religiosity is a continuum of piety or devotion, commonly operationalized to include frequency of church attendance, membership in other religious groups such as youth groups, and subjective personal importance of religion (Abbott-Chapman & Denholm, 2001;Sinha, Cnaan, & Gelles, 2007;Steinman & Zimmerman, 2004). Therefore, from a Meaning Maintenance Model perspective, that believers vs. nonbelievers may respond differently to immortality primes is not a matter of their religiosity (e.g.…”
Section: Spiritual Belief As a Moderator Of Immortality Primingmentioning
confidence: 98%