Adopting electrocoagulation technology for removing arsenic from contaminated water

Abdulredha, Muhammad; Ismael, Hussein Idrees; Khalaf, Zahraa D.; Abood, Emad Salaam

doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1088/1/012020

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 10 shows the results of electrochemical remediation of polluted water systems. Abdulredha et al [127] performed electrocoagulation of As(III) polluted water with a concentration of 300 mg/L, using a stainless steel electrode. At optimal operating conditions of electric current density of 6 mA/cm 2 , at pH = 9.0 and a duration of 30 min, the efficiency of As(III) removal was achieved in the amount of 81.0%.…”

Section: Recent Knowledge On Chemical Remediation Of Soil Water and Airmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Trends and Future Perspectives in the Remediation of Polluted Water, Soil and Air—A Review

Ugrina,

Jurić

2023

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The protection of all environmental compartments (water, soil, air) is of great interest for the normal functioning of life on Earth. The environment is systematically polluted with different concentrations of physical, biological and chemical pollutants. For the purpose of environmental protection, numerous in situ and ex situ biological, chemical and physical remediation techniques have been developed. Most techniques have limitations, such as high cost, processing time or environmental feasibility. In general, biological techniques have proven to be the most environmentally friendly compared to chemical and physical techniques. Furthermore, remediation is an extremely complex procedure due to the complexity of the pollutant composition. Therefore, the implementation of individual physical, biological or chemical remediation techniques is often not sufficient for adequate remediation of the polluted environment. Accordingly, for more economical and efficient environmental remediation, it is recommended to use a combination of techniques that should meet the requirements of efficiency and treatment duration. Ultimately, this review provides a concise overview of the recent application of physical, biological and chemical remediation techniques to all compartments of the polluted environment. A critical review of existing knowledge on environmental remediation through a search of the relevant literature has helped to assess the basic challenges and limitations that arise in the issue of environmental remediation, as well as providing recommendations and guidelines for future research.

show abstract

Section: Recent Knowledge On Chemical Remediation Of Soil Water and Airmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Trends and Future Perspectives in the Remediation of Polluted Water, Soil and Air—A Review

Ugrina,

Jurić

2023

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…shows the results of electrochemical remediation of polluted water systems. Abdulredha et al [42] performed electrocoagulation of As(III) polluted water with a concentration of 300 mg/L, using a stainless steel electrode. At optimal operating conditions of electric current density of 6 mA/cm 2 , at pH=9.0 and during 30 minutes, the efficiency of As(III) removal was achieved in the amount of 81.0%.…”

Section: Recent Knowledge On Chemical Remediation Of Soil Water and Airmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Trends and Future Perspectives in the Remediation of Polluted Water, Soil and Air - A Short Review

Ugrina,

Jurić

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The protection of all environmental compartments (water, soil, air) is of great interest for the normal functioning of life on Earth. Namely, the environment is systematically polluted with different concentrations of physical, biological and chemical pollutants. For the purpose of environmental protection, numerous in situ and ex situ biological, chemical and physical remediation techniques have been developed. Most techniques have limitations such as high costs, processing time and environmental feasibility. In general, biological techniques have proven to be the most environmentally friendly compared to chemical and physical techniques. Furthermore, remediation is an extremely complex procedure due to the complexity of the pollutant composition. Therefore, the implementation of individual physical, biological or chemical remediation techniques is often not sufficient for adequate remediation of the polluted environment. Accordingly, for more economical and efficient environmental remediation, it is recommended to use a combination of techniques that should meet the requirements of efficiency and treatment duration. Ultimately, this short review presents a concise overview of the recent application of physical, biological and chemical remediation techniques to all compartments of the polluted environment (water, air, soil). A critical review of existing knowledge on environmental remediation through a search of relevant literature helped to assess the basic challenges and limitations that arise in the issue of environmental remediation, as well as providing recommendations and guidelines for future research.

show abstract

Electrochemical remediation of arsenic and fluoride from water: A review of the current state and future prospects

Islam¹

2023

Environmental Technology & Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adopting electrocoagulation technology for removing arsenic from contaminated water

Cited by 4 publications

References 33 publications

Current Trends and Future Perspectives in the Remediation of Polluted Water, Soil and Air—A Review

Current Trends and Future Perspectives in the Remediation of Polluted Water, Soil and Air—A Review

Current Trends and Future Perspectives in the Remediation of Polluted Water, Soil and Air - A Short Review

Electrochemical remediation of arsenic and fluoride from water: A review of the current state and future prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About