2011
DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2010.511697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adopting learning technologies: from belief to practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second area to be considered is the gap between pedagogic theory and practice, and technology. This gap has been explained as being between the reality of HE teaching and learning practices (Breen et al, 2001), and the rhetoric of institutional policies relating to e-learning and ICT use (Habib and Johansen, 2014); as being between pedagogy and technology (Unwin, 2007); as being between semiotic needs and technological needs (Blin and Munro, 2008); and as being between educationalists and technicians (Bothma and Cant, 2011). The third area is the ambiguous impact of technology on teaching.…”
Section: Distance Learning and Icts In Professional Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second area to be considered is the gap between pedagogic theory and practice, and technology. This gap has been explained as being between the reality of HE teaching and learning practices (Breen et al, 2001), and the rhetoric of institutional policies relating to e-learning and ICT use (Habib and Johansen, 2014); as being between pedagogy and technology (Unwin, 2007); as being between semiotic needs and technological needs (Blin and Munro, 2008); and as being between educationalists and technicians (Bothma and Cant, 2011). The third area is the ambiguous impact of technology on teaching.…”
Section: Distance Learning and Icts In Professional Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bothma and Cant (2011) describe a set of university lecturers who were in favour of using a learning management system but did not actually use it. In other cases, individuals may have little choice as to whether or not to continue to use a technology (Shelton, 2014).…”
Section: Adoption and Non-adoption Of Technology In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic tenet for technology acceptance research is that users' beliefs influence their intention to use technology, which, in turn, influences their adoption of technology in reality [28,29]. With the increase of ICT initiatives in the educational context, users' reluctance and concerns about ICT for teaching and learning purposes arose [30]. Guided by technology acceptance research, educational researchers have identified a wide range of factors to build positive relations between users and ICT [31].…”
Section: Technology Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%