Adoption and diffusion of improved technologies and production practices in agriculture: Insights from a donor-led intervention in Nepal

Kumar, Anjani; Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Thapa, Ganesh; Adhikari, Naveen; Saroj, Sunil; Karkee, Madhab; Joshi, P. K.

doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104621

Cited by 85 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the case of resource conservation in the Ecuadorian Andes, it was shown that when conservation technologies were offered in conjunction with measures that enhance the short-term profitability of agriculture (such as new crops, biological barriers and improved agricultural production), the adoption of conservation practices increased significantly 8 . Similar results were found in the Nepal Knowledge Based Integrated Sustainable Agriculture and Nutrition (KISAN) project 30 . These two examples reflect the broader finding that in most of the reported PES case studies, socioeconomic and environmental outcomes have been positive 8,15,30 , especially if the PES is accompanied by technical assistance 7,12 .…”

Section: Why Is This Methods So Important?supporting

confidence: 86%

“…Similar results were found in the Nepal Knowledge Based Integrated Sustainable Agriculture and Nutrition (KISAN) project 30 . These two examples reflect the broader finding that in most of the reported PES case studies, socioeconomic and environmental outcomes have been positive 8,15,30 , especially if the PES is accompanied by technical assistance 7,12 .…”

Section: Why Is This Methods So Important?supporting

confidence: 86%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes

Piñeiro

Arias²,

Dürr³

et al. 2020

Nat Sustain

376

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing pressure on agricultural production systems to achieve global food security and prevent environmental degradation necessitates a transition towards more sustainable practices. The purpose of this scoping review is to understand how the incentives offered to farmers motivate the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and, ultimately, how and whether they result in measurable outcomes. To this end, this scoping review examines the evidence of nearly 18,000 papers on whether incentive-based programmes lead to the adoption of sustainable practices and their effect on environmental, economic and productivity outcomes. We find that independent of the incentive type, programmes linked to short-term economic benefit have a higher adoption rate than those aimed solely at providing an ecological service. In the long run, one of the strongest motivations for farmers to adopt sustainable practices is perceived benefits for either their farms, the environment or both. Beyond this, the importance of technical assistance and extension services in promoting sustainable practices emerges strongly from this scoping review. Finally, we find that policy instruments are more effective if their design considers the characteristics of the target population, and the associated trade-offs between economic, environmental and social outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Why Is This Methods So Important?supporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Why Is This Methods So Important?supporting

confidence: 86%

A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes

Piñeiro

Arias²,

Dürr³

et al. 2020

Nat Sustain

376

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Access to extension service and advice from agriculture technicians have influence farmers in the adoption of improved production technologies to increase production (Ghimire et al, 2015;Ransom et al, 2003;Rogers, 1983;Barao, 1992) which is similar to findings of this research. Also, Kumar et al (2020) found that various agriculture technologies are more likely to be adopted by farmers who have received training, have contact with agriculture technicians, have access to extension services and membership of agriculture groups which is in line with the findings from this study. Membership in agriculture related organizations helps farmers in the decision making process for the adoption of recommended production technologies (Subedi et al, 2019).…”

Section: Factors Affecting the Adoption Of The Recommended Varietysupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Similarly, Khanal (2016) found that the odds of adoption of IPM practice was more for those farmers who have access to agriculture technicians and extension workers. Exposure to demonstrations or training helped to increase the adoption of technologies or improved practices by raising the likelihood of receiving information about various technologies (Kumar et al, 2020).…”

Section: Factors Affecting the Adoption Of The Recommended Varietymentioning

confidence: 99%

Adoption status of improved production technology in rice cultivation in Kanchanpur, Nepal

Pokhrel

Dhakal

Kafle

et al. 2021

Arch. Agric. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study was carried out in 2020 to assess the scenario of the improved production technologies among rice growers in Kanchanpur and to identify the factors influencing the adoption of these technologies. The simple random sampling procedure was used to collect data from 90 respondents using a semi-structured interview schedule from Belauri, Bhimdutta municipality, and Beldandi rural municipality which are under the command area of the rice super zone, Kanchanpur. The information on prevailing cultural practice, production, and productivity, adoption of improved technology, problems/constraints faced by farmers in rice cultivation in the study area were collected from the farmers by interview. The data were processed, cleaned, and analyzed using software MS-excel and SPSS. The simple descriptive and inferential statistics like chi-square and binary logistic regression models were used to find the relationship between dependent and independent variables. Respondents adopted plant protection measures (chemical weed control, insects, and disease control) and seed treatment relatively less than they adopted recommended variety, Seed Replacement Rate (SRR), and storage treatment. The majority of the respondents were affiliated with the farmers’ groups but the majority of them had not received training. Furthermore, spade, hoe, tractor, thresher, sickle, wooden plough bullock cart water pumps, tillers, reapers were used by respondents. Binary logistic regression revealed that membership of agriculture group, advice from agriculture technician, training, visit of extension workers and rice cultivated land had a positive and significant effect on the adoption of various production practices. Inadequate availability of fertilizers and inputs (0.85), Inadequate training (0.68), inadequate machinery availability (0.54) were the major constraints faced by the farmers on rice cultivation.

show abstract

“…The household survey was carried out using a semi-structured questionnaire. The questions were developed after reviewing relevant literature on technology adoption [6,[27][28][29]. Next, we documented possible variables on cost activities, returns and issues of tunnel farming.…”

Section: Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Tunnel Technology on Crop Productivity and Livelihood of Smallholder Farmers in Nepal

Jamarkattel²,

Maraseni

et al. 2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technologies-based production practices are critical for agricultural growth and sustainable development in low-income countries like Nepal. In the last few years, tunnel house has been increasingly promoted as tools to enhance smallholder farmers’ livelihood and tackle climate adversaries. However, little is known about what factor determines its adoption and whether it helps smallholders adapt to climate change and experience better livelihood. We address these gaps using the cross-sectional survey data collected from 62 adopters and 92 non-adopters in three municipalities of Bagmati Province. We employed descriptive analysis and probit model and found out that age, farm size, and ethnicity strongly influence the technology adoption amongst smallholder farmers. Additionally, treatment model and ordinary least square (OLS) regression were utilized to examine tunnel technology’s effect. Our study shows that tunnel significantly increases production by 32 tons/year/hectare and protects crops from climate change effects such as heavy rainfall and temperature change. Likewise, tunnel technology increases the net crop income by $1700/year/hectare. However, the economic benefit is not substantial compared to technology’s adoption cost as adopters incur enormous costs of $12,000/year/hectare on equipment, labor and resources. These results suggest policymakers should concentrate on reducing the technology’s cost, which could be achieved through subsidies, financial support, or price control mechanisms. Ensuring technology’s affordability can contribute to smallholder farmers’ sustainable livelihood in Nepal and countries with similar contexts.

show abstract

Adoption and diffusion of improved technologies and production practices in agriculture: Insights from a donor-led intervention in Nepal

Cited by 85 publications

References 55 publications

A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes

A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes

Adoption status of improved production technology in rice cultivation in Kanchanpur, Nepal

The Effects of Tunnel Technology on Crop Productivity and Livelihood of Smallholder Farmers in Nepal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About