Adoption of AI-Enabled Tools in Social Development Organizations in India: An Extension of UTAUT Model

Abstract

Social development organizations increasingly employ artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled tools to help team members collaborate effectively and efficiently. These tools are used in various team management tasks and activities. Based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), this study explores various factors influencing employees’ use of AI-enabled tools. The study extends the model in two ways: a) by evaluating the impact of these tools on the employees’ collaboration and b) by exploring the moderating role of AI aversion. Data were collected through an online survey of employees working with AI-enabled tools. The analysis of the research model was conducted using partial least squares (PLS), with a two-step model – measurement and structural models of assessment. The results revealed that the antecedent variables, such as effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions, are positively associated with using AI-enabled tools, which have a positive relationship with collaboration. It also concluded a significant effect of AI aversion in the relationship between performance expectancy and use of technology. These findings imply that organizations should focus on building an environment to adopt AI-enabled tools while also addressing employees’ concerns about AI.

Users’ continuance intention towards an AI painting application: An extended expectation confirmation model

“…Furthermore, the design and functionality of AI painting tools may constrain the expression of personal innovativeness. Some users may expect greater flexibility in incorporating their creativity and ideas, but the algorithms and operational methods of AI painting tools may limit the individual’s space for innovation, thereby weakening the correlation between personal innovativeness and satisfaction [ 61 , 94 ].…”

Revolutionizing decision support: a systematic literature review of contextual implementation models for electronic health records systems

“…Study design. Of the 20 included studies,1 theory of change (Adedeji et al, 2022), 2 were a randomized controlled trial (Moja et al, 2016a, b), 2 were Mixed-methods (Gold et al, 2019;Zhai et al, 2022),3 Case study (Bossen et al, 2013;Cresswell et al, 2012;Grenha Teixeira et al, 2019) and 10 were cross-sectional studies (Ahmed et al, 2020;Bashiri et al, 2023;Erlirianto et al, 2015;Iqbal et al, 2013;Jain et al, 2022;Kroth et al, 2019;Lee et al, 2022;Maillet et al, 2015;€ Ozkara et al, 2021;Sheehan et al, 2013). Location of studies.…”

Educators’ Utilizing One-Stop Mobile Learning Approach amid Global Health Emergencies: Do Technology Acceptance Determinants Matter?

“…Furthermore, studies were conducted on the scale of developing the countries' scope, i.e., India., while numerous articles have approved the superiority of the UTAUT in the technology acceptance scenario, especially technology that was used in learning and education as mobile technology and applications [34]. The UTAUT can also explain 41% of the variances within the behavioural intention of technology users and 23% of the technology use behaviour [35]. The UTAUT setup estimates duo variables of dependent (DVs), such as behavioural intent (BI) and user behaviour (UB), via the assessment of influence and four main variables of independent IVs: the expectancy of performance (PE), the expectancy of effort (EE), the influence of socially (SI), and the conditions of facilitating (FC) [34].…”