2002
DOI: 10.1080/09638280110066307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of Assistive Technology for computer access among college students with disabilities

Abstract: This study supports the need for specific training programmes and course work for college students with disabilities who are interested in improving computer access skills.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The other important factor that affects students' adoption of an innovation is their own personal characteristics, including patience, self-motivation, personal priorities, self-confidence, expectations, and acceptance of their disability (Goodman, Tiene, & Luft, 2002). This finding is consistent with the findings from studies when some students reported they adopted the DTTs due to their self-driven behavior.…”
Section: Support To Use the Innovationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The other important factor that affects students' adoption of an innovation is their own personal characteristics, including patience, self-motivation, personal priorities, self-confidence, expectations, and acceptance of their disability (Goodman, Tiene, & Luft, 2002). This finding is consistent with the findings from studies when some students reported they adopted the DTTs due to their self-driven behavior.…”
Section: Support To Use the Innovationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, the area of assistive technology most needed by students with disabilities was a desktop computer and again a personal notebook. This result relates to studies by Fichten et al [18] and Goodman et al [19], who found that students with disabilities frequently used computers and the internet in their daily lives and for educational purposes. Moreover, the findings of this study are consistent with results from Gitlow et al [20], who stated that the needs identified most frequently existed in the categories of aids for hearing and vision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Disabled students are using both generalised and specialised technologies (Mortimore and Crozier 2006;Fichten et al 2000) Disabled students express high levels of comfort and fluency with regards to some technologies and low levels for others (Parker and Banerjee 2007) There is a perceived lack of support or training to enable disabled learners to become fluent users of specialised assistive technologies (Shevlin, Kenny and Mcneela 2004;Cobham et al 2001;Goodman, Tiene and Luft 2002) Technology provision by institutions is regarded by students as variable (Draffan, Evans and Blenkhorn.2007;Fichten et al 2003) The system for assessing and funding assistive technology is frustrating for disabled students (Goode 2007;Shevlin, Kenny and Mcneela 2004) The location of IT facilities and a lack of specialised software presents barriers for disabled students (Fuller et al 2004) Not all students take up the technology support that is offered (Draffan, Evans and Blenkhorn. 2007) …”
Section: Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%