Adoption of ASTM A956-06 Leeb hardness testing standard to rock engineering applications

Ghorbani, Sasan; Hoseinie, Seyed Hadi; Ghasemi, Ebrahim; Sherizadeh, Taghi

doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129886

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Safety concerns have been raised for both techniques, including an increased risk of hand and eye injuries. The use of non-destructive hardness testing has been put forward in the literature as an alternative to standard destructive testing (Ghorbani et al 2023). This study evaluates a methodology for hardness testing to be used to collect standardised test results in the field and relate these back to uniaxial compressive strength (UCS).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of Leeb hardness field test methodology to be used during rock core logging

Nasir,

Powell

2023

SSIM 2023: Third International Slope Stability in Mining Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the use of non-destructive Leeb hardness testing as an alternative to conventional rock strength evaluation field tests including using geological hammers and point load testing devices. Conventional methods are noted to be subjective and/or potentially dangerous, resulting in rock fragment ejecta attributed to causing injury including blindness. Leeb hardness testing offers a safer approach with the potential for improved reliability and data, and standardisation of results. Testing is performed on diorite, andesite and dolerite igneous rocks retrieved as NQ size rock core during diamond drilling at the Newmont Boddington Gold Mine. A field-testing methodology is developed through a detailed data-driven familiarisation process to determine the sensitivity of Leeb hardness test results. Hardness testing is undertaken using the Equotip 550 device. Initial evaluation includes assessment of circumferential and longitudinal test results, separation between test locations and number of repeat tests per location, statistical evaluation, comparison of proximal results on vein structures (i.e. quartz) and country rock, effect of inclination of test device, applied pressure during testing and wet versus dry conditions. The effect of sample seating is also evaluated, comparing results of testing core laying within plastic core tray grooves to core laying in steel v-notch grooves often used during orientation of rock core.Using the empirically derived methodology, testing is undertaken at metre marks along rock core in plastic core tray grooves. Results from multiple drill holes are included in the study. Testing is also performed on core samples sent to the laboratory for determination of parameters including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). Correlational factors between Leeb hardness and UCS, density test results are derived through assessment of the field and laboratory test results and compared with published data. The methodology offers a relatively quick, safe and reliable way of determining and understanding rock strength and parameter variation along the length of rock core and, more widely, within the rock mass ultimately being evaluated.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%