Adoption of BIM in architectural design firms

Gökuç, Yeliz Tülübaş; Arditi, David

doi:10.1080/00038628.2017.1383228

Cited by 43 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various factors are associated with a firm's willingness, motivations and capacity to adopt BIM but prominent demographics include: company size, clientele, history/experience of the firms (Cao et al 2017;Lee et al 2015), along with their role in the construction supply chain (Ashcraft 2008;Tulubas Gokuc and Arditi 2017).…”

Section: Factors Associated With Bim Usementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whilst BIM represents a technological innovation, the processes of applying BIM in construction organizations can be conceptualized through the lens of innovation diffusion theory (Cao et al 2017;Gledson 2016;Poirier et al 2015;Tulubas Gokuc and Arditi 2017). Consequently, the first engagement of companies with BIM involves making a decision on either using BIM or persevering with traditional methods (Tulubas Gokuc and Arditi 2017)-a process often based upon: market pressure (Lee et al 2015;Zhang et al 2018); clients' demands (Lee and Yu 2016;Lee et al 2015;; and bandwagon impacts, namely, pressures stemming from awareness of the sheer number of firms that have already adopted BIM (Kale and Arditi 2010).…”

Section: Bim Usementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a relatively new disruptive innovation for the construction context (Tulubas Gokuc and Arditi 2017). The term 'BIM use' captures the status of BIM execution on construction projects, covering an entire range (Chong et al 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Roadmap to Mature BIM Use in Australian SMEs: Competitive Dynamics Perspective

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research explores and reports upon the scale of BIM implementation maturity (from nonadoption to full-scale deployment) within Small-to-Medium Enterprises (SMEs) operating within the Australian construction industry. The research utilizes a Competitive Dynamics Perspective (CDP) as the theoretical lens and analyses data collected from 135 SMEs using Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) to provide a richer insight into levels of BIM implementation maturity. Findings reveal that there is no meaningful association between BIM implementation maturity within SMEs and their organizational attributes (such as size and level of experience). Additionally, lack of solid evidence to support a reasonable return on investment (ROI) was found to be the key barrier to using BIM in higher levels of maturity. In practical terms, the study focuses upon pertinent issues associated with mandated BIM in Australia from SMEs' perspective, pointing out potential consequences, and challenging the pressure for mandating. The research concludes by providing pragmatic recommendations designed to accelerate the pace that Australian SMEs move across a BIM trajectory from non-adopters to higher levels of maturity.

show abstract

Section: Factors Associated With Bim Usementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Bim Usementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Roadmap to Mature BIM Use in Australian SMEs: Competitive Dynamics Perspective

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the previous section, it was highlighted that visualization is one of the most powerful benefits of BIM technologies, and has acted as a major driver in the shift in stakeholder processes to deal with and exchange information on designated elements in buildings. As discussed earlier, better understanding of the designed project and the relationships between the various systems within the building is provided through 3D visualization using BIM tools (Tulubas Gokuc & Arditi, 2017). There are three purposes of representation and visualization between stakeholders listed as follows:…”

Section: Representationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Realistic representation using different tools to show ideas of designed elements, selected forms, materials, envelope, etc., to serve sustainability targets. Such Figure 5: Brief definition to the areas of development visualization options have improved the ability to rigorously analyse different alternatives with clients and other stakeholders (Tulubas Gokuc & Arditi, 2017). Sustainable design solutions are easily modelled and changed in the project real-time and this is already common practice in firms which are adopting BIM, which indicates that further development is not a major concern or a critical aspect in enhancing decision making processes regarding sustainability.…”

Section: Representationmentioning

confidence: 99%

BIM for sustainable project delivery: review paper and future development areas

Mohamed

Alwan

McIntyre

2019

Architectural Science Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The evolution of Building Information Modelling (BIM) is transforming practice in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. BIM provided revolutionary ways of generating, visualizing, exchanging, predicting and monitoring information. Over the last decade, delivering sustainable projects has become a high priority along with the recognition of the role the BIM plays to improve efficiency. However, BIM-enabled sustainability practices are still relatively immature and inconsistent. Previous research has identified challenges in the delivery of green-rated buildings, that include: dealing with documentation, evidencing requirements, monitoring progress, and decision making. Limited studies focused on linking workflow obstacles of green projects to potential improvements using current BIM capabilities. Through interrogating existing research via a systematic literature review, this paper takes the original approach of constructing an 'analysis map' to 'bridge the gap' and highlight current limitations and successes between BIM and sustainability practices. The findings are formulated through two parallel investigation tracks: the first is design task/ BIM capability analysis, and the second is green project delivery problem/BIM enabled sustainability application. This research highlights future potential investigation areas, which are categorized into six clusters: representation; performance simulation; transaction and exchange; documentation; automation; and standardization and guidance.

show abstract

Is BIM Too Detailed for Conceptual Designing? A Case Study

Abdelhameed

2021

Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 3

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adoption of BIM in architectural design firms

Cited by 43 publications

References 25 publications

Roadmap to Mature BIM Use in Australian SMEs: Competitive Dynamics Perspective

Roadmap to Mature BIM Use in Australian SMEs: Competitive Dynamics Perspective

BIM for sustainable project delivery: review paper and future development areas

Is BIM Too Detailed for Conceptual Designing? A Case Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About