2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0086520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of CO2 blended with C6F6 as working fluid in CSP plants

Abstract: The adoption of CO2-based mixtures as power block working fluid for CSP plant can turn supercritical CO2 cycles into efficient transcritical cycles even at high ambient temperature, with significant performance improvement and potential power block cost reduction. In this work, the use of CO2+C6F6 mixture as working fluid for a power cycle coupled with a solar tower is analyzed. Two different cycle maximum temperatures (550°C and 650°C) are considered and for both configurations the overall plant design is per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The four methodology steps are detailed in the following subsections. The properties for the mixture are obtained with the Peng-Robinson method and a binary interaction parameter of kij=0.033 according to [9].…”
Section: Methods and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four methodology steps are detailed in the following subsections. The properties for the mixture are obtained with the Peng-Robinson method and a binary interaction parameter of kij=0.033 according to [9].…”
Section: Methods and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second power cycle considered for turbine maximum temperatures of 550°C is a sCO2 cycle adopting the recompression layout, proposed in figure 3. For maximum temperature levels of 700°C, instead, the steam cycle cannot be considered: the sCO2 recompression cycle is again considered for this applications, as various literature works highlighted its promising performances in recompression layout for solarized applications [27].…”
Section: Power Cycles Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the study presented by Tafur-Escanta et al [7], blending CO 2 with carbonyl sulfide (COS) increased the efficiency of the cycle to 45.05%, compared to 41.25% for pure CO 2 , while the specific investment cost decreased to 2621$/kWe for the blended CO 2 cycle compared to 2811$/kWe for the pure CO 2 cycle. The SCARABEUS consortium proposed hexafluorobenzene (C 6 F 6 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), and titanium tetrachloride (TiCl 4 ) as possible candidate mixtures [8,9]. The effects of changing C 6 F 6 and TiCl 4 molar fractions on cycle performance were presented, considering safety and health characteristics [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%