Adoption of Community-Based Strategies for Sustainable Vector Control and Prevention

Rivera, Elizabeth Pellecer; Arrivillaga, Margarita Rivera; Juarez, Jose G.; Urioste-Stone, Sandra De; Berganza, Elsa; Pennington, Pamela M.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.4243799

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are 56 communities in Comapa with a population of > 27,000, of which over 80% live in rural areas and almost 90% live in poverty (11). A total of ve communities were randomly selected from a subset of 18 communities from a previous study in the region related to peridomestic animal management for Chagas disease control (11)(12)(13)(14). Households surveyed were the same as the ones selected in the previous studies (24 households per community), providing us with information regarding the presence of dogs in the household.…”

Section: Sampling Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dog ectoparasites as sentinels for pathogenic Rickettsia and Bartonella in rural Guatemala

Tian,

Juarez,

Moller-Vasquez

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Fleas and ticks serve as vectors of multiple pathogens in the genera Rickettsia and Bartonellathat cause diseases in humans and other animals. Although human rickettsiosis and bartonellosis have been reported in all countries in Central America, limited research has been conducted to investigate the natural cycles of flea- and tick-borne rickettsiosis and bartonellosis, especially in Guatemala. Methods: We evaluated dog parasites as sentinels for zoonotic disease risk in rural Guatemala by sampling ticks and fleas from dogs, which were then identified and individually screened for Rickettsia and Bartonella. Results: A total of 77 households were surveyed and 80.52% of them had dogs. Overall, 133 dogs were examined for fleas and ticks, of which 68.42% had fleas and 35.34% had ticks. A total of 433 fleas and 181 ticks were collected from the infested dogs, with an additional 33 ticks collected from house walls. Three flea species were identified: Ctenocephalides felis (70%), Echidnophaga gallinacea(11.8%), and Pulex sp. (17.8%). Among the collected ticks, 97% were Rhipicephalus sanguineus with the rest being Amyblyomma cajennense, A. auricularium, and A. ovale. Rickettsia felis were detected in six C. felis, in one Pulex sp., and in two R. sanguineus, while Candidatus R. senegalensis was detected in one C. felis. Bartonella was detected only in fleas, including three Pulexsp. infected with B. vinsonii subsp. Berkhoffii, B. henselae, and Bartonella sp., respectively, and 11 C. felis infected with B. henselae. Conclusions: This study reports Candidatus R. senegalensis and B. vinsonii subsp. Berkhoffiiin Guatemala for the first time, and indicates the potential risk of human and dog exposure to Rickettsia and Bartonella species. These results show that dogs provide critical information relevant to managing human potential exposure to flea- and tick-borne pathogens in rural Guatemala.

show abstract