2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of coronary artery disease - Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS™) and observed impact on medical therapy and systolic blood pressure control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 CAD-RADS correlate with the degree of stenosis measured by invasive coronary angiography(ICA) with high diagnostic accuracy. 15,16 The grading of CAD-RADS are: CAD-RADS 0(0%)-absence of CAD, CAD-RADS 1(1-24%)-minimal non obstructive CAD, CAD-RADS 2 (25-49%)-mild non obstructive CAD, CAD-RADS 3(50-69%)-moderate stenosis, CAD-RADS 4 A(70-99%) or 2-vessels ≥ 70% stenosis, and CAD-RADS 4 B left main ≥50% or 3-vessel obstructive (≥70%) disease-Severe stenosis, CAD-RADS 5(100%)-total occlusion in one or all 3 coronary arteries and CAD-RADS N (non-diagnostic study-obstructive CAD cannot be excluded. 14 Grading of stenosis of each coronary artery was done as per the classification system suggested by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 CAD-RADS correlate with the degree of stenosis measured by invasive coronary angiography(ICA) with high diagnostic accuracy. 15,16 The grading of CAD-RADS are: CAD-RADS 0(0%)-absence of CAD, CAD-RADS 1(1-24%)-minimal non obstructive CAD, CAD-RADS 2 (25-49%)-mild non obstructive CAD, CAD-RADS 3(50-69%)-moderate stenosis, CAD-RADS 4 A(70-99%) or 2-vessels ≥ 70% stenosis, and CAD-RADS 4 B left main ≥50% or 3-vessel obstructive (≥70%) disease-Severe stenosis, CAD-RADS 5(100%)-total occlusion in one or all 3 coronary arteries and CAD-RADS N (non-diagnostic study-obstructive CAD cannot be excluded. 14 Grading of stenosis of each coronary artery was done as per the classification system suggested by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Recent publications have highlighted that adoption of CAD-RADS in clinical practice results in reduced downstream testing and cardiology referral rates in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease 22 and has a favorable impact on medical therapy and systolic blood pressure control. 23 Finally, recent studies have validated the performance of deep learning algorithms for the evaluation of CAD-RADS classification on CCTA. 24 There has been widespread adoption of CAD-RADS in clinical practice with most sites in the United States and around the world using this classification for reporting CCTA on a routine basis.…”
Section: Clinical Value Of Cad-rads and Coronary Ct Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hull, Thomas and colleagues reported the association of structured CTA reporting using CAD-RADS to changes in statin and aspirin following the institutional adoption of CAD-RADS reporting. 24 The authors observed that statin initiation or dose escalation was more common in the CAD-RADS period (adjusted OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.12–1.90), mainly driven by new statin prescriptions in those with CAD on CTA. The authors also observed slight reductions in post-CTA cholesterol values (compared to pre-CTA values) following the institution of CAD-RADS reporting.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%