2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of fire prevention measures – Predictors in a representative German sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. This result is consistent with previous research on individual disaster preparedness and fires [44], but cannot explain a large part of the variation in fire safety behaviours due to the low prevalence of residential fires in the sample (2 percent).…”
Section: Correlation With Fires In the Past 5 Yearssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. This result is consistent with previous research on individual disaster preparedness and fires [44], but cannot explain a large part of the variation in fire safety behaviours due to the low prevalence of residential fires in the sample (2 percent).…”
Section: Correlation With Fires In the Past 5 Yearssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2 does not mimic cross-sectional evidence of changes in positive attitudes towards risk-taking across the life span, which are consistently negative in most risk-taking domains [54]. Likewise, given that experiences of fires or similar emergency situations have been shown to increase precautionary behaviour [44] and that logically more older people would have experienced emergencies, it could be expected that a linear, increasing, fire protection curve could be seen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The obtained research results show that slightly more than half of the respondents participated in firefighting and that they have some kind of experience in such situations. Such results may indicate that fires are very common in the workplace or that experiences have been gained through various trainings, which is consistent with the results of previous research (Nilson & Bonander, 2020;Stumpf et al, 2017). However, the question arises as to whether the way of reacting in such situations was appropriate and timely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Existing research has also identified a list of individual sociodemographic factors associated with disaster preparedness, e.g., [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], which includes migration status [ 22 , 23 ], race and ethnicity [ 24 ], income [ 25 ], education level [ 26 ] and homeownership [ 27 ]. Hazard adaption, which is usually constructed by hazard experience, knowledge, risk perception and self-efficacy [ 28 ], is another individual inherent factor which may have a significant influence on disaster preparedness [ 7 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Generally, individuals with previous disaster experiences are more likely than those without to better prepare for disasters [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%