2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/compsac.2014.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of Free Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS): A Risk Management Perspective

Abstract: Free Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) has become a strategic asset in software development, and open source communities behind FLOSS are a key player in the field.The analysis of open source community dynamics is a key capability in risk management practices focused on the integration of FLOSS in all types of organizations. We are conducting research in developing methodologies for managing risks of FLOSS adoption and deployment in various application domains. This paper is about the ability to systematicall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our proposal, we have requirements elicitation and risk identification performed in Early Requirements and the creation of the models for WIS that use Linked Data in Late Requirements. Kenett et al (2014) propose capturing, filtering, analyzing and reasoning about risks, based on RISCOSS, using a three layered approach to risk management in FLOSS (Free Libre Open Source Software) projects. In the first layer, raw data is collected from FLOSS communities and projects; in the second layer risk indicators are defined and models are produced, in which the risks can be linked to the objectives; finally, in the third layer the risks indicators are converted in Business Risks and, linked with iStar, model business goals to see how risks impact them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our proposal, we have requirements elicitation and risk identification performed in Early Requirements and the creation of the models for WIS that use Linked Data in Late Requirements. Kenett et al (2014) propose capturing, filtering, analyzing and reasoning about risks, based on RISCOSS, using a three layered approach to risk management in FLOSS (Free Libre Open Source Software) projects. In the first layer, raw data is collected from FLOSS communities and projects; in the second layer risk indicators are defined and models are produced, in which the risks can be linked to the objectives; finally, in the third layer the risks indicators are converted in Business Risks and, linked with iStar, model business goals to see how risks impact them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central concept in i* is that of intentional actor. Intentional properties of an agent such as goals, beliefs, abilities and commitments are used in modelling requirements [2], [14]. The actor or agent construct is used to identify the intentional characteristics represented as dependencies involving goals to be achieved, tasks to be performed, resources to be furnished or soft goals (optimization objectives or preferences) to be satisfied.…”
Section: The I* Modelling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other risk impact factors also include project size, organizational impact, and complexity of project dependencies within an organization and technological compatibilities and architectures [2], [14]. Underestimating technical risk on integration is a major challenge when adopting OSS [21]. Culture can also be a risk factor in OSS adoption because if internal personnel are not open to the implementation of OSS, it will increase the time spent training users to adopt the system and consequently affecting the cost of implementation [15].…”
Section: Risk In Adoption Of Ossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding to that, the level of interest in the project suggests better quality and compliance [22]. There are two types of ecosystems related to OSS [21]:…”
Section: Oss Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation