2017
DOI: 10.5958/0973-9718.2017.00025.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of improved scientific goat rearing practices in Tamil Nadu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding general management practices (Table 2) adopted by the farmers, weaning of kids (78.33) had higher adoption index score followed by farm record maintenance(75.00), tagging (70.41), castration of kids (70.00) and hoof trimming (20.41). This is in agreement with the findings of Singh et al, (2017); Suresh and Vasanthakumar (2017) who reported that castration of male had fewer adoption score and weaning of kids had higher adoption score, respectively. Kumar (2007) reported in his study on commercial goat farming in India that, overall 6.00 per cent of the commercial goat farmers had adopted hoof trimming, 67.00 per cent adopted tagging of kids for identification and 72.00 per cent and 50.00 per cent of them had awareness and adoption of farm record maintenance, respectively.…”
Section: Partial Adoptionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Regarding general management practices (Table 2) adopted by the farmers, weaning of kids (78.33) had higher adoption index score followed by farm record maintenance(75.00), tagging (70.41), castration of kids (70.00) and hoof trimming (20.41). This is in agreement with the findings of Singh et al, (2017); Suresh and Vasanthakumar (2017) who reported that castration of male had fewer adoption score and weaning of kids had higher adoption score, respectively. Kumar (2007) reported in his study on commercial goat farming in India that, overall 6.00 per cent of the commercial goat farmers had adopted hoof trimming, 67.00 per cent adopted tagging of kids for identification and 72.00 per cent and 50.00 per cent of them had awareness and adoption of farm record maintenance, respectively.…”
Section: Partial Adoptionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The major constraints were nonavailability of green fodder, lack of grazing area, lack of veterinary services, lack of credit facility, lack of improved breeding ram, inadequate price for the animals, illiteracy and poor knowledge of scientific sheep rearing. These findings are almost similar to that recorded by Nitharwal (1999), Kulkarni and Jawahar (2000), Kumar (2003), Mohan and Singh (2004), Meganathan et al (2004), Senthil andMeganathan (2005), Singh and Chauhan (2006), Porwal et al (2006), Gurjar and Pathodia (2008), Suresh et al (2008) but are contradictory with findings of Eswara and Radha (1996), Misra et al (2000), Kumaravel and Krishnaraj (2007), Swarnkar and Singh (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Data were collected from these five districts using stratified random sampling. Two hundred fifty households' data were collected on management practices and farmers socioeconomic profiles using a pretested interview schedule as per the [6] guidelines. The interview schedule was carefully prepared to cover all aspects of Thanjavur Black goat farming to collect the most first-hand information (primary data) from the farmers.…”
Section: Study Area and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%