2008
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v16i4.704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, part 3: medical record environment comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…National pilot projects are underway and have been making progress for several years in France 82. In the UK, the English national project (National Program for IT/Connecting for Health) has been making steady progress since 2002, but many prescriptions are still printed as barcodes, and ETP continues to be the key challenge 38,87,88. In more recent years, Northern Ireland and Wales have both implemented national projects also based on printed barcoded prescriptions, while a national ETP project (ePharmacy) was widely adopted in Scotland82.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National pilot projects are underway and have been making progress for several years in France 82. In the UK, the English national project (National Program for IT/Connecting for Health) has been making steady progress since 2002, but many prescriptions are still printed as barcodes, and ETP continues to be the key challenge 38,87,88. In more recent years, Northern Ireland and Wales have both implemented national projects also based on printed barcoded prescriptions, while a national ETP project (ePharmacy) was widely adopted in Scotland82.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of apparently successful national programmes to share records between primary and secondary care exist in Scotland, New Zealand, and Denmark. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] In Denmark, for example, all the country's general practices, hospitals, pharmacies, and laboratories are linked via a single national network, and electronic transfer of prescriptions, laboratory results, letters, and emails is the norm, though (perhaps significantly) there is no centrally held record. These national schemes differ in some fundamental technical features, but all report similar critical success factors: a pace of progress commensurate with levels of engagement and tension for change; early and frequent dialogue between key stakeholders to develop a culture of collaboration; systematic attention (such as via focus groups or discussion networks) to potentially contentious issues; strong peer influence (such as through clinical user groups); careful alignment of incentives for both individuals and organisations; transparency in monitoring and evaluation; and balancing central and local leadership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNOMED CT 19 is increasingly used internationally and is progressively being introduced across the UK. 20,21 SNOMED CT is much more sophisticated than Read. It includes concept identifiers (ID) which categorise each code; the equivalent of the chapters in Read.…”
Section: Methods Terminologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%