2010
DOI: 10.1186/1747-597x-5-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment

Abstract: BackgroundThe gap between research and practice limits utilization of relevant, progressive and empirically validated strategies in substance abuse treatment.MethodsParticipants included substance abuse treatment programs from the Northeastern United States. Structural equation models were constructed with agency level data to explore two outcome variables: adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools at two points in time; models also included organizational, staffing and service variables.ResultsIn 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many factors can negatively affect an organization’s decision to adopt a specific evidence-based model for substance abuse intervention and its resulting implementation (e.g., size, resources, staff attitudes and education, local laws and policies) [25,26]. In this light, it is necessary for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners to have tools at their disposal for measuring the extent to which a model has been implemented in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors can negatively affect an organization’s decision to adopt a specific evidence-based model for substance abuse intervention and its resulting implementation (e.g., size, resources, staff attitudes and education, local laws and policies) [25,26]. In this light, it is necessary for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners to have tools at their disposal for measuring the extent to which a model has been implemented in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…primary care, general hospital wards and mental health services) or on the readiness for treatment. A degree of standardisation of assessment, coupled with standardised outcome reporting, would enable the comparison of services locally, nationally and internationally . In some health‐care systems, assessment is linked to treatment pathways and associated funding tariffs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%