2012
DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2012.744906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of soil and water conservation technologies in the Rwizi catchment of south western Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
47
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in line with findings of others like Sidibe (2005) and Mugonola et al (2013). On the other hand, experience is negatively related to choice of extension as a major information source because experienced individuals tend to know much about their farming activities hence may not require or seek additional information from any formal sources.…”
Section: Importance Of Other Information Sources For Farmers In Tororsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This result is in line with findings of others like Sidibe (2005) and Mugonola et al (2013). On the other hand, experience is negatively related to choice of extension as a major information source because experienced individuals tend to know much about their farming activities hence may not require or seek additional information from any formal sources.…”
Section: Importance Of Other Information Sources For Farmers In Tororsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The river flows eastward, dissecting a number of papyrus Bubaare, Rwanyamahembe, Rwengwe, Bugamba, Kyangyenyi, Rugando, Ndeija and Itojo (Mugonola et al, 2013a). In addition, sediment measurements were taken in selected subcatchment areas along the river, targeting areas with intact, medium, and completely degraded wetland vegetation.…”
Section: Swc In the Upper Rwizi Micro-catchmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A household survey was conducted among 271 households drawn from Mbarara, Bushenyi, and Ntungamo districts in selected subcounties of Bukiro, adoption may be explained by the differences in socioeconomic characteristics, asset endowments, farm structural characteristics, perception of land degradation problem, and access to institutional support (Mugonola et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Household size is an indication of labor availability. Labor availability for farm has also been found to influence the decision to adopt improved soil and water conservation technologies (Yila and Thapa, 2008;Mazvimavi and Twomlow, 2009;Mugonola et al, 2013). Therefore, the number of family members or adult equivalents (labor) available for farm work is likely to influence whether a technology is adopted or not.…”
Section: Estimating Marginal Effects Of Adoption Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%