Adoption rationales of new management practices

Abstract

This study considers that multiple and diverse rationales, including rational, emotional and socially conditioned responses can influence the adoption of management practices. The study includes four case studies in order to subject the adoption rationales that Sturdy (2004) posits to empirical inquiry and to explore the impacts of these differing rationales on characteristics of the subsequent adoption. The findings show that five of the six rationales Sturdy proposes are empirically identifiable. The findings also suggest that, subject to the exploratory nature of the study, earlier adoption of management practices is associated with political and psychodynamic rationales, consistent with notions of being seen to adopt new ways of working. The findings also suggest that the political and dramaturgical rationales are associated with more rapid adoption due to influential individuals or groups acting as champions. Whilst Sturdy proposes his rationales as a simple list, the findings of this study suggest a more complex relationship between the rationales. The study contributes to the growing body of literature that addresses the important topic of management practices, particularly those that provide an expository consideration.

Innovation management practices: cross‐sectorial adoption, variation, and effectiveness

“…Van Rossem and Van Veen (2011) highlight that awareness levels are likely to vary with demographic characteristics such as educational level, hierarchical position and industry sector. Motivations for using IMPs include institutional legitimacy and professional conformity (Daniel et al, 2012); e.g. engineers adopt new tools to appear or feel more innovative (Benders and Slomp, 2009).…”

Exploring the use of patents in a weak institutional environment: The effects of innovation partnerships, firm ownership, and new management practices

“…Although recent studies on complementarities and appropriability have made some progress, as far as we can tell, there has been no effort to examine whether the pursuit of enhanced management practices works in tandem with patenting to reinforce firms' abilities to reap the benefits of innovation. This is particularly relevant in our context, as the fragility of institutions promotes greater uncertainty (Kotabe et al, forthcoming), yielding managers more receptive to the adoption of these practices in an effort not only to ascribe legitimacy to their own actions (Daniel et al, 2012;Lieberman and Asaba, 2006) but to compensate for the weaknesses of the IPR system. Therefore, we hypothesize that, all else constant:…”

Understanding top management’s decision-making on implementing project management systems - an exploratory study

“…Daniel et al [27] have proved that multiple and diverse rationales, including rational, emotional and socially conditioned responses can influence the adoption of management practices.…”