2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01057.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADP‐induced platelet aggregation in the microcirculation of pig myocardium and rabbit kidneys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory that platelet stimulation may lead to intimal injury is supported by another series of publications, recently summarized as an Historical Sketch in this Journal [47]. We were able to show that ADP stimulated platelets in rabbits and pigs may cause endothelial injury and vasculitis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The theory that platelet stimulation may lead to intimal injury is supported by another series of publications, recently summarized as an Historical Sketch in this Journal [47]. We were able to show that ADP stimulated platelets in rabbits and pigs may cause endothelial injury and vasculitis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Abundant evidence published from the 1960s and onwards supports the essential role of platelets in the initial stages of atherosclerosis, as recently reviewed [1,2]. Governed by disturbed flow, platelets adhere to the arterial wall in vivo , even in the absence of endothelial cell denudation, initiating lesion formation [3–6]. In hypercholesteremic rabbits, platelets adhere to sites with a predilection for atherosclerosis before lesions are detectable [5].…”
Section: Platelets In Atherosclerosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, platelet aggregates have been found as microemboli in downstream epicardial and intramyocardial arteries in cases of sudden coronary death [39–41]. Experimentally, embolism with platelet aggregates in the myocardial microcirculation may alone cause infarction [30, 42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%