Adquisición de la precisión del habla de oraciones en niños con implante coclear

Neves, Anderson Jonas das; Almeida-Verdu, Ana Claudia Moreira; Silva, Leandra Tabanez do Nascimento; Moret, Adriane Lima Mortari

doi:10.18800/psico.202002.002

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As previously mentioned, not all studies provided a reference for their measure/method (e.g., An et al., 2012 ; Arumugam et al., 2021 ; Blamey et al., 2001 ; Boonen et al., 2020 ; Daneshmandan et al., 2009 ; Melo et al., 2017 ) and not all studies described the measure/method they were using (e.g., Alenzi et al., 2020 ; Jalil-Abkenar et al., 2013 ; Venkataramani et al., 2021 ; Wu et al., 2008 ; Zhou et al., 2013 ). In some cases, it was therefore unclear exactly what measure/method was being used (e.g., das Neves et al., 2020 ; Lucchesi et al., 2015 ; Tomblin et al., 2008 ; Warner-Czyz & Davis, 2008 ; Zachariah & Kumaraswamy, 2015 ). It is an interesting result that when the subjective and objective measurements are compared, more of the studies conducted in English speaking countries used objective measures, and more of the studies conducted in different languages, used subjective scales (See Table 2 for evidence synthesis summary).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring speech intelligibility with deaf and hard-of-hearing children: A systematic review

Stefánsdóttir,

Crowe,

Magnússon

et al. 2023

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is great variability in the ways in which the speech intelligibility of d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children who use spoken language as part, or all, of their communication system is measured. This systematic review examined the measures and methods that have been used when examining the speech intelligibility of children who are DHH and the characteristics of these measures and methods. A systematic database search was conducted of CENTRAL; CINAHL; Cochrane; ERIC; Joanna Briggs; Linguistics, Language and Behavior Abstracts; Medline; Scopus; and Web of Science databases, as well as supplemental searches. A total of 204 included studies reported the use of many different measures/methods which measured segmental aspects of speech, with the most common being Allen et al.’s (2001, The reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility following pediatric cochlear implantation. Otology and Neurotology, 22(5), 631-633. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012) Speech Intelligibility Rating scale. Many studies included insufficient details to determine the measure that was used. Future research should utilize methods/measures with known psychometric validity, provide clear descriptions of the methods/measures used, and consider using more than one measure to account for limitations inherent in different methods of measuring the speech intelligibility of children who are DHH, and consider and discuss the rationale for the measure/method chosen.

show abstract