“…In our study, lipid-poor adenomas showed a lower unenhanced attenuation than nonadenomas (22 HU 6 6 vs 34 HU 6 7; P , .001), as in previous studies (5,(9)(10)(11)(12)(19)(20)(21)(22). Additionally, the absolute enhancement of adenomas was 1.5-fold higher than nonadenomas (P , .001), which is also corroborated by data from numerous studies wherein adenomas had higher (up to 2.2-fold) absolute enhancement compared with nonadenomas, mostly comprising metastases (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)14,16,22,29,30) (Table E4 [online]). We introduced a new imaging parameter of relative enhancement ratio by combining unenhanced attenuation and absolute enhancement, yielding a diagnostic performance almost comparable with the previously reported washout CT (sensitivity, 86% vs 82%-92%; specificity, 95% vs 87%-100%) for the discrimination of lipid-poor adenomas (5,9,10,21).…”