1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57317-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma

Abstract: A review of 28 cases of adrenal cortical carcinoma provides some insights into the natural history of this disease and suggests modifications in current techniques of diagnosis and management. Our patients ranged in age from 1 to 69 years but it is notable that all of our male patients were more than 39 years old. In addition the men tended to have high stage tumors that were nonfunctional. Female patients, on the other hand, were more evenly distributed in terms of stage, function and age at diagnosis. Stagin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
17

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
94
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonfunctioning tumors were defined as adrenal masses in the absence of any clinical sign of adrenal hyperfunction and in the absence of abnormally elevated adrenal hormone levels, as previously reported (8). Staging of the disease was carried out according to the MacFarlaneSullivan classification (10,11). Diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed by histological examination following the criteria reported by Weiss et al (12) (Weiss score, see Table 1), which define malignancy as the presence of three or more histological findings, including high nuclear grade (13), mitotic rate greater than 5 per 50 high-power fields, atypical mitotic figures, eosinophilic tumor cell cytoplasm ($75% of tumor cells), diffuse architecture ($33% of tumor), necrosis, venous invasion, sinusoidal invasion, and capsular invasion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonfunctioning tumors were defined as adrenal masses in the absence of any clinical sign of adrenal hyperfunction and in the absence of abnormally elevated adrenal hormone levels, as previously reported (8). Staging of the disease was carried out according to the MacFarlaneSullivan classification (10,11). Diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed by histological examination following the criteria reported by Weiss et al (12) (Weiss score, see Table 1), which define malignancy as the presence of three or more histological findings, including high nuclear grade (13), mitotic rate greater than 5 per 50 high-power fields, atypical mitotic figures, eosinophilic tumor cell cytoplasm ($75% of tumor cells), diffuse architecture ($33% of tumor), necrosis, venous invasion, sinusoidal invasion, and capsular invasion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various clinical parameters that have been shown to impact adrenocortical carcinoma prognosis, tumor staging has been demonstrated as one of the most important (13). The staging system for adrenocortical carcinomas depends upon tumor size, nodal involve-ment, invasion of adjacent organs, and presence of distant metastasis (9). However, it is important to know that is not uncommon for patients with small tumors to experience relapses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duas escalas de estadiamento tumoral têm sido utilizadas para a classificação dos TAC pediátricos, a Escala de Macfarlane modificado por Sullivan (6,14), que utiliza tamanho tumoral (< ou > 5 cm) e a Escala de Sandrini modificada, que utiliza volume tumoral (< ou > 200 cm 3 ) (1). A distinção na criança entre adenomas e carcinomas pela classificação histopatológica é difícil.…”
Section: Descritoresunclassified