1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-9781(96)00251-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adrenomedullin(16–31) Has Pressor Activity in the Rat But Not the Cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AM receptor antagonist AM 22-52 did not completely block this response, even at 10 K6 M concentration. This antagonist has been shown previously to be inefficient at blocking the AM receptor, therefore, the result observed in our study is not surprising (Champion et al 1997, Nishikimi et al 1998. It is clear that HMECs express at least one fully functional AM receptor sub-type, which when activated leads to an increased level of cAMP.…”
Section: Am (10supporting
confidence: 70%
“…The AM receptor antagonist AM 22-52 did not completely block this response, even at 10 K6 M concentration. This antagonist has been shown previously to be inefficient at blocking the AM receptor, therefore, the result observed in our study is not surprising (Champion et al 1997, Nishikimi et al 1998. It is clear that HMECs express at least one fully functional AM receptor sub-type, which when activated leads to an increased level of cAMP.…”
Section: Am (10supporting
confidence: 70%
“…(1997a) found that, in the perfused hindlimb vascular bed of the cat, ADM (22–52) did not influence vasodilator responses to ADM, but inhibited the responses to the structurally similar peptide, calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP). However, there is evidence to suggest that the mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular effects of ADM fragments may differ between rats and cats ( Nossaman et al ., 1996 ; Champion et al ., 1997a , 1997b ) and, in a more recent study ( Dogan et al ., 1997 ), it was shown that co‐infusion of ADM (22–52) with ADM inhibited the regional cerebral vasodilator effects of ADM in rats. Therefore, our first objective was to determine an effective antagonistic dose of ADM (22–52) against the regional systemic vasodilator effects of exogenous ADM in vivo ( Gardiner et al ., 1995a ), before assessing the influence of that dose of ADM (22–52) on the vasodilator responses to LPS infusion under different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, C-terminally shortened fragments, which contained the bioactive ring structure, like ADM 1-25 , ADM [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] , ADM [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] , ADM [16][17][18][19][20][21] and ADM [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] , were shown to possess vasopressor activity. This adverse effect to full-length ADM 1-52 is not mediated by the interaction with CLR/RAMP complexes but probably involves the release of catecholamines and the activation of α-adrenergic receptors [102][103]…”
Section: Additional Targets For Adrenomedullinmentioning
confidence: 99%