2004
DOI: 10.1049/ce:20040304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADSL2: a sequel better than the original?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we intended to assess the QoS levels, not for the aggregate traffic but for traffic directed to individual subscribers, we specified this time that the point of potential congestion was the customer's ADSL2 connection (Androulidakis et al, 2004). As we intended to assess the QoS levels, not for the aggregate traffic but for traffic directed to individual subscribers, we specified this time that the point of potential congestion was the customer's ADSL2 connection (Androulidakis et al, 2004).…”
Section: Experimental Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we intended to assess the QoS levels, not for the aggregate traffic but for traffic directed to individual subscribers, we specified this time that the point of potential congestion was the customer's ADSL2 connection (Androulidakis et al, 2004). As we intended to assess the QoS levels, not for the aggregate traffic but for traffic directed to individual subscribers, we specified this time that the point of potential congestion was the customer's ADSL2 connection (Androulidakis et al, 2004).…”
Section: Experimental Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%